Regarding this, I am seeing if I can see the actual paper for myself, cause it might mention something there. I agree with scientific papers it is vague, but roughly just about everything else is classified. If we can see from somewhere, (anywhere) in the paper that something matches on to known stuff, then we might just be able to use it.
1 Like
PLAAF is really bad at PR, ngl
As CW Lemoine said none of the displays match up with what actually happens, might be because for OPSEC or for casual audience viewing
Granted this is an old video
1 Like
J-10B hopefully next major update?
1 Like
Also some details on the J-10C
Top left you can see the difference in cockpit, J-10B has 3 MFDs while J-10C has a single large display with a smaller one below it
J-16 and J-20 use a similar layout
Top right it states WS-10B is rated for 14 tons of thrust
Watch them adding J-15 and Liaoning to justify it existance
I want J-15, but the inital variant isn’t very good
J-15T is a monster though, it’s probably even better than the J-16 in A2A
J-10B cockpit (roughly)
J-10B’s radar
Also, this is supposedly what the radar on the J-10C looks like
It’s definitely a different radar, it doesn’t have the IFF interrogators like on the radar of the J-10B.
1 Like
TY. Where do u guys get these pics, just interested.
Oh, great. My bad, never though u could just do that.
1 Like
Yeah, that matches up pretty well.
Wooooo
1 Like
J-8F too?
1 Like
Nice sidegrade over the pseudo-Magic-2 of PL-5EII
1 Like
Congrats 🎉
But in fact PL-8B to replace PL-5E II if PL-8 stock
PL-8B instead PL-5B on J-8F, my guess
1 Like