Chengdu J-10, History, Performance & Discussion

[ACOMETS]

[Cooked_dough]

Do Gaijin have any plans to fix the modeling errors of the LS6 series bombs? The issue I submitted in the bug report Model Errors of the LS-6 Series Bombs has been locked, and the Reporting Manager provided no reason for the lock… This modeling problem is an objective fact.

Model Errors of the LS-6 Series Bombs

This is a bug topic dedicated to the model issues of the LS-6 series bombs. Before this, I had already written a bug report Model Errors of the LS-6 Series Bombs. However, the Reporting Manager deemed my supporting materials insufficient to substantiate the issue and then locked it… This has really frustrated me, so I plan to post a special topic about this bug on the forum. These were a series of canned responses, and he didn’t even give specific reasons for the rejection. [image] ①Incorr…

[slithly]

all LDIRCM has limited field of view, especially the mi28/ka52(one of them) which only has it on the bottom, but somehow it works against top down missiles

[梦_之_泪_伤]

So the j10c, like the j11a, exists only to feed other people, the so-called model modification, the working time is just an excuse, and it doesn’t even take a day to fix the radar and correct the thrust.

[kizvy]

Calling j11a bad is insane. Best 13.3 in the game

[IJN_Musashi]

I prefer the mkk tbh

[141_allen]

Previously it was… Now it’s great since decompression and all that happened.

[silent_requiem75]

what???

[Clap6005-live]

Its a joke/sarcasm

[Clap6005-live]

@Smin1080p_WT

considering if the targeting pod indeed has the IRCM/DIRCM capabilities, it’s limited pivot would mean it would work only from spesific angles.

This is such a bad take when we have helicopters with 360° spherical coverage from a single sensor on the bottom of the helicopter, (MI-28NM)

And other helis also completely ignoring deadzones and sensor amounts

[NCC105]

@Clap6005-live

with 360° spherical coverage from a single sensor on the bottom of the helicopter, (MI-28NM)

actually not, but still larger than it should. currently Mi-28nm has a leak in top front

[Clap6005-live]

Cant say ive ever had a IR missiles hit a MI-28NM except FB-10A’s in DL+IOG

[NCC105]

current MI-28nm player should almost all know this, so they can avoid this by lifting the head. in close range like GRB, the heli need to heading down to maker sure the missile getting into the blind area

[141_allen]

I haven’t been able to test but they did something to the radar can someone check if they have actually deleted fast tws?

[NCC105]

@141_allen

if they have actually deleted fast tws

yes

[miki3084]

✌ The current J-10C is probably incomparably more comfortable than before the update. Probably.

[霸天虎牢大乐迪]

It’s just a overdue and forgotten bug that finally got fixed

[inThrustWeTrust]

Haven’t got the C yet but J-10A is clapping at 13.7.

[kizvy]

j-10c is okay, but i just hate how little counter measures it has. not enough for top tier battles imo.
Oh well, 72 is not as bad as other future chinese jets like the su-33 rip off, j-15. that thing gets 48 cms which is positively horrendous for what’s probably going to be a 13.7 jet.
or even worse, mig-35 with 32 counter measures.
if j-10c had bol cms or just like 20 more cms it would’ve been peak

[inThrustWeTrust]

i rarely run out of countermeasures in J-10A, 12 flares and 60 chaff, when deployed moderately it lasts for 2 IR and 6 ARH missiles which is enough for the most games. Granted i usually play high and fast rushing flanks so for someone goes into furballs i assume it might not be sufficent.