In aeronautics, drag in kgf is the air resistance converted into kilograms-force. It’s used to measure the force opposing the aircraft as it moves forward. Therefore, engine power is what’s needed to compensate for this drag.
You’re talking about drag in relation to engine power, that’s why I pointed out that your curve is linked to engine performance and not the fuselage. You’ve used the wrong category when you created your curve.
you still don’t have any proof that why J-10 should have such high cd0.
while all secondary analysis suggests it focus on supersonic fighting.
J-10A’s mid-range coupled canard wing and supersonic rectangular inlet suggests it was born more as an interceptor, and the background of its design also suggests this. in J-10C it changed to DSI but the basic design still remains same.
yeah, my mistake take a year it eventially coming to that speed as far as the darg is lower than engine power, but the accerlation after M1.2 is significantly slower compare with the others make it in battle or test it with time check, meanwhile the others easily get above M1.5