do you know how GPS bombs work compared to TV, IR or laser weaponry in the game??👀👀👀
1 Like
no, no matter how much it’s better than JDAM/KAB, it’s still a GPS guided toy that tracks fixed point and need long time to fly. few people will use it after some days
and why you guys always underestimate AGM-65, it’s still the second best cas load out, just slower than KH-38, and similar in other part
3 Likes
tell me the advantage you have with LS-6 compared to AGM 65 or Kh 29 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀
3 Likes
This is ironic considering the balance of Chinese vehicles compared to the big 3.
4 Likes
lmao. Just take your double-standard balance go away.
7 Likes
mmmhh we would say that the GPS bombs are coded to avoid terrain
womp womp
7 Likes
Neat. Wonder if that applies to all of them or just jdams
I noticed something odd when I was looking up the type of thermal pod that the J-10A uses, and the thermal generation it has
Supposedly, it’s identical to the K/ADC03A carried by the JH-7A, yet on Thunderview, it’s listed as having different thermal generations (Gen 2 on the J-10 and Gen 2+ on the JH-7). Is this intentional? Can anyone confirm?
Thunderview thermal chart:
Dev Server JH-7A:
Dev Server J-10A:
For Su-34, Su-24M2, Su-30SM, MiG-29K (9-41R) and Su-35S. My guess
On Su-34M ?
J-10 Firebird series (PLAAF & PLAN), Guizhou FTC-2000G, Hongdu L-15A & L-15B, JF-17A2 (JF-17 Block 2), JF-17C and J-16 mounted LS-6 ?
AV-8B Night Attack (USMC) and AV-8B+ (USMC & Italian Navy) already GBU-38 but lack GBU-32(V)2/B
I hope gajin rename GBU-38 JDAM from dev server to GBU-38(V)2/B on AV-8B Night Attack and AV-8B+
Now in dev server A-10C and F-16C Block 50 no GBU-31(V)1/B JDAM (gajin add later)
But for F-14B. rename F-14B → F-14B(U), change Sparrow HUD instead current HUD and add GBU-31(V)2/B
I looking forward JDAM 4 variants
- GBU-31(V)1/B
- GBU-32(V)1/B
- GBU-32(V)2/B
- GBU-38(V)1/B
Bro literally Mavericks are guided, LS6 is just a ‘more accurate’ CCRP, I could throw retarded S25 from 1km alt to 10 km out if I am willing to, so why is this all of a sudden so overwhelming? Like are you just standing there for 2 minutes and waiting for the bomb to hit you? It won’t be able to do anything in an urban environment anyways.
4 Likes
Strange how people like you never keep this same energy when you get your shiny toys that have zero equivalents or counterparts
4 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/e9gTIpUADREo
400 view, 342 signatory and still no modo to answer me… T-T
Ping a mod
mod confirmed gaijin’s source of adjusting J-10’s performance, but with clear mistake. the max speed here is structure damage speed not max speed.
and from datamine, the drag factors was increased by 11%
2 Likes
bros, my friends and I are working on a issue about J-10’s resistance in high speed, which is preliminarily proved(it takes J-10 about 3 times the time to get from Mach1.0 - 1.1 compared to F16)
But we meet some problem in material source as we are not experts in these.
Now, we need material about:
- pubilished books/papers about aerodynamic design , explaining that any part of these design(mid-range coupled canard wing+delta wing+supersonic rectangular inlet), have low supersonic zero up resistance
- Introduction of J-10, directly explaining its configuration it’s low resistance in supersonic.
Material‘s language is not problem, we’ve collected some, but not enough convincing. And thanks for any future help.
5 Likes
4 Likes
My compatriots have also published a large amount of evidence and issues in different partitions, most of which have been rejected by TrickZZter for various reasons. You can view a wealth of evidence by examining the posts in each section
@NCC105
5 Likes
Name of the book?