This is clearly a copy of the Wright Flyer!!!111
2 Likes
The C-701 anti-ship uses SAPHE but for the T and KD version this is not indicated, the C-701 only has 30.5 kg which may appear but explosive is used, I remind you: (AGM-65, composition B explosive 39 kg for 830 mm pen) - (AKD-10, HTA explosive 5.21 kg for 1 400 pen!!!)
find the type of explosive to use in the T/KD version
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/EQcCthxzfFDI
I had already made a report on the LS-6 and FT gps bomb
I know, I’m telling you that they listened. Though only for the jf-17 so far. We’ll have to wait to see what they do with the jh7a and j10.
Now, the resistance of J10A is too high.
1 Like
datamine？
yes
It doesn’t really matter that much for Mavericks cause Mavericks considered explosive content the secondary kill shot although most things die to the explosion rather than the pen :D.
Is that a 500kg bob under the belly? In theory it could be both a normal or guided but Gaijing just didn’t want to make that.
+2 GB 500 on the inner wing pylons, which brings to a total of 5 GB 500
Not in dev server though, a bit sad.
heard of it, but it’s hard to issue it, and the flight model is still under working. maybe it’s possible to issue it with aerodynamics analysis
The performance of J10A in the dev server is incorrect. When its speed exceeds the speed of sound, its aerial acceleration performance is very poor.It has been added with too much incorrect flight resistance.
1 Like
The J-10A has received its 72x Large Countermeasures on the dev server as of 2.38.0.20
6 Likes
Good stuff, now we need to get the drag fixed because it has way too much drag atm
it’s said to be the dual pylon’s large resistance causing the speed problem
there’s no way dual pylons cause a plane like this to have more air resistance than a F-4 Phantom
and besides, you ahve said drag even without pylons equipped
great they added the LS-6 for the JF-17, the J10A, J8F and JH7A can also shoot them,
I made a report which explains all that
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/EQcCthxzfFDI
4 Likes
no,I didn’t say anything about “without pylons equipped”, I’m too busy to study it’s flight performance these days. everything I know are from others, and I doubt some of the information, I would test it with my friends if possible.
but if it’s really the pylon’s problem, there would be no way to issue it