Se2 stats aren’t bad
i dont sadly. im looking into it
The range it makes you die to the good kind of IRCCM (shrinking FOV), but its better then nothing
yes the overall Range should be around 3-5000 if were taking arbitrary values since i suspect thats what it is for most other MAWS as well
meanwhile, see this:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/0BsEFXwkrJzv
Wait so it actually only had Rear MAW? If so, why J-11B also don’t receive it?
J-11B has maws, also only rear but modeled as 360 °
for JF-17, irl it only has rear so that’s it
Yeah but in game it should also like JF-17 since the MAW only on the rear side.
classic Gaijin C&P code
This image is actually of the KLJ-7 (Non-AESA)
the KLJ7-A is on the JF-17C tranche 3 and has 3 variants. tbh i myself dont know which one was selected but only 2 out of the three are possible
-
Static KLJ-7A

-
Dynamic KLJ-7A with mechanical repositioner

I beleive number 2 might have upto 90 degrees scan limits on either side OBS.
here are the radar options sources/brochures that were trialled:
EDIT: #3 has been removed. it was not a KLJ-7A variant nor the competitor LKF601E
not side, but all
it’s like EFT’s radar, tilt on a rotating base. if it’s 30 degree tilt, then it’s 100 degree
@WreckingAres283
can this be used for a report (for missiles being mountable on the inner pylons)?

(provided that this is an official graphic)
in tandem with these
we already know AGMs/AShMs can be fired from that pylon

Additionally, there are images of the JF-17 having a different CM dispenser with more slots


this could bring the total number of CMs upto 18+18 on top and 18+18 on bottom (as compared to 14+14 on bottom). On Block 1 (in game version) this would mean a total of 72 CMs. On block 3 (i hope its added) it would mean a total of 18+18+20+20 on top and 18+18 on bottom (as compared to 14+14 on bottom). This results in a total of 112 CMs for Block 3.
rd-93ma has 9000 kgf thrust not 9300

What will the sensor fusion add?
The jeff will be able to tell what kind of missile is coming and only deploy chaff or flares and not both
Extra countermeasures? Is this worth bug reporting?
i want to. dunno if i have enough data to back it up. since i dont know the source of the images (iirc forums dont count or something)
but as long as they aren’t edited they should be fine. Otherwise it will be dumb. I’ll have a look into it, looks like it’s from a private source though, probably someone in like CAIG museum or sth.
yeah i tried doing the reverse image search, those on the DCS forum are the only instances of the images online as far as google says



