J-7 BGI will likely serve our airforce till 2050. Most likely it will be replaced by F-16s due to some geopolitical reasons. Who knows maybe J-10s would come.So i think airforce wouldn’t convert J-7s to FC-1 or FTG-2000.
Currently our airforce is making a indigenous jet(Claimed by them) which is probably based on some chinese jet. My guess is that it’s either based on K-8 or JL-9/FTC-2000. Btw it will be revealed soon.
2 Likes
Worth the wait.
1 Like
Looks like JF-17 can use AMRAAM
2 Likes
PL-12 is a bit better I think
But can it actually use AMRAAM?
It’s possible early models used AMRAAM for testing, Pakistan had the F-16.
7 Likes
well pakistan also has f 16’s so they probably incorporated compatibility with western ammunition to ensure it can use them as well
1 Like
That’s what I said.
3 Likes
I look forward any day gajin consider early lightweight 4th generation Multirole fighter aircraft toptier to China tech tree rank 8 because believe that good Air realistic battle, Air simulator battle, Ground realistic realistic battle and ground simulator battle
It can’t be acknowledged since, IIRC, US disagreed with integrating Aim120 onto JF-17.
what about ASRAAM?
They did not (and still don’t) need the US permission.
Block 1 could be added right now…
1 Like
Apparently this was the aircraft they were working on.Absolute disappointment to be honest,I cant believe they wasted millions on a ultralight.Btw It’s name is BBT-1
Spoiler
2 Likes
2 Likes
it being a squadron vehicle is such a tragedy.
1 Like
Gaijin is based on BR to mount corresponding weapons to aircraft.
I hope that JF-17 can recive a lower BR if gaijin refuse provide SD-10 for its
i doubt they’ll give it anything other than pl5’s cause if they gave it its sd-10’s it would be 13.3 which is way too high for a squadron vehicle.
refer to the F-5E take AIM9L/Python 3 on Japanese TT，maybe JF-17 will recive PL-5C/PL-9（not even PL-5E2 and PL-9C） and a few CAS weapons
doubt it will get its full cas loadout either. i hope we get the block 2 in the tech tree.