So for it to parrot all those bogus sources I would’ve had to find all those sources supporting my argument myself? Why even put it through the bot then? lmao
Also in previous topics, I literally posted links so anyone could see the entire convo and even question the bot themselves
You instructed it to repeat what you say, try stating that outside of that instruction
I think the whole line of big chunky non-jet bombers such as Antonov’s aircrafts, could be added and they won’t suffer that much as they would’ve before.
Pretty obv he’s a troll that wants to keep bombers strong to fight fighters lmfao. He sources grok, cherry pick documents, tanks 9 missiles “but it didnt’t hit the right spot” and you think he’s arguing in good faith?
I didnt say bombers should tank 9 missiles, but I did explain why they ARE tanking 9 missiles at the moment, due to a shortcoming in breakaway sections. Sections turn black after a single direct hit, but if its not hitting a spot that can break off, it just doesnt
im starting to understand. bomber pilots will do anything but actually learn how to play the game.
i watched another content creator say that all bomber pilots want is to be indestructible while they fly in a straight line for hours on end to press spacebar until they finally unlock the F15. just for them to not have the faintest clue how to fly it if they do somehow manage to unlock it.