XA-38 did not get the buff ))))
Do you even own it?
Example:
A wing spar has 100 health and takes 100 rounds to destroy, decreasing the health of the spar by 10% decreases it to 90, rounds required go destroy go down to 90.
You can put it either way and the result won’t change.
Incremental change is better than anything else.
Incendiary rounds have always been a joke in this game, it’s why you only see the incendiary of the MK 108 in the default belt and nowhere else. Gaijin knows it sucks and has known that it sucks for years, so they take advantage of it to make stock grind more frustrating so you’ll spend more GE.
It’s even more ridiculous when you realize that the default belt is actually the recommended belt for the MK 108 as a bomber hunter, a half/half distribution of HE and Incendiary, because the incendiary is actually really useful.
The only exceptions is for upwards firing Mk 108s, which makes sense from the British tests where HE rounds work if coming from below, or instead of using the 50/50 split using only the mine-incendiary round which was a mix of both HE and incendiary.
1 Like
Don’t need to. There’s no hordes of XA-38s running around, therefore it was not buffed.
And it’s not on the list.
And this is why your comments are very biased. Not owning things / have used them means 0 experience in it.
But i still think that a wing root of a B-17 should be structurally damaged enough to be ripped off after a lot fewer rounds than in the video i posted. 10-15% simply Isn’t going to cut it.
You have to take into account that the wing didn’t even get ripped off in that video. Who knows, probably could’ve tanked the same amount twice, or more.
1 Like
How is he biased when he is just saying a factual statement. the XA-38 did not receive the durability buff.
I must have posted the official changelog in a very oppinionated manner!
2 Likes
And apart from the XA-38 not being on the list of aircraft that were buffed, it hasn’t appeared in the patch notes afterwards either to receive the buff.
Don’t post those damn opinionated assumptionated links!
1 Like
He likes to talk about performance of vehicles while also not ever using them all.
I never said in regards to the list.
Although the Xa-38 needs some love tbh
The one way mentality you and @PercussionCap share is peak
You’ve shown me nobody is entitled to their own opinions / thoughts.
And only you guys can assume lol
In any case, now that shooting bombers in the air with the 75mm has gotten boring… I know what I’ll be continuing tomorrow!
THE BOAT DEMANDS SACRIFICE
And if I owned it, I would also think a mach 3 interceptor seeing RWR-less subsonics (or even if they have an RWR, many cannot detect J-band) is incredibly unfair and shouldn’t happen. I don’t care how off-meta it is. It’s just one of many planes that doesn’t really fit the game and won’t ever do well unless it is ridiculously undertiered.
Noone said that.
We’re just making fun of you saying that facts are actually opinions.
It’s not even just that vehicle though lol. You’ve done it a few times now.
Something something ToS something something.
Oh wait… that apparently only applies to me.
Something something (self diagnosed) “facts” something something
You must be 110 now if you were flying that 110
All it takes is pointing out the issue or nonsense going on with whatever you say and you devolve to these ridiculous strawmans.
I don’t need to fly the Bf 110 to know where the guns are located.
So it’s nonsense to think about possibilities ?
My my how the forums have fallen.
I do find it funny you consistently are going against ToS yet nothing ever occurs to people such as yourself. Miracle that is.
Honestly I would love to watch gaijin follow yours and others every whim to merely ruin the game.