Nah, damage to centeral landing gear leg, a war thunder classic
And this against brings up the issue of how the hell should we calculate the damage of mine shells when this internal blast of pressure varies not just by bomber but by what area and what condition the area was already in
You mean on the photos?
I guess, yeah, but without overhauling the entirety of all plane models and the respective damage models, that isn’t something they can do.
Pfft, hahaha, my translator doesn’t quite understand the terminology of War Thunder, or maybe there’s an issue with my habitual phrasing.
But I was thinking, instead of turning the bomber into a flying block of concrete, what about reinforcing its automatic machine gunners?
I feel like that would enrage the fighters even more, the issue here is they’re having trouble killing the bomber. But atleast they get to live. This would cause the bombers actively hunt them
They should, shell hit from the back need to shoot though Multi-layer of metal at the sharpest angle. while shooting form the side, top or bottom should guarantee critical hit with the explosive shell.
Unless they made the gunners aimbot snipers with 2+km range, fighters would probably still win in most cases without some survivability improvements
Let alone cases where turret coverage is very weak, such as on the Lancaster
I have read ~1500 replies in the span of three-ish days and all I’ll say is that my brain hurts very very much and i don’t know anymore what to think of this, a bunch of bugs, fire weak, unmodeled components, and a whole ton of bickering that looks like it goes away but comes back T_T
Yeah, they should overhaul this stuff, but this isn’t something we can wait for.
We need survivability improvements right now and with how plane damage models work, the best they can do is just make the existing parts of the planes more durable.
It should be much faster with AI nowaday.
A handful of badly placed 7.62mm turrets vs fighter that can just annihilate the bomber with a single hit
Who would win?
It’s not the bomber
That’s wishful thinking
So basically uhhh give it pre nerf naval gunner AI lmao
That aimbot AI doesn’t help when your plane has no turret coverage at all
curved boolets
It wouldn’t be anywhere as bad if certain participants would stop arguing about things that have already been established, or would just read the documentation.
or better yet quit employing selective favoratism over which documents to listen to, or when one source if ok, and then suddenly not ok.
or listening to math
Hahahahahah look at this guy. We have pointed out multiple times in the thread that just applying a calculation as if the shell is detonating outside of the structure is a way to get deliberately low values. And he denied it whenever someone brought up that point.
And how he ADMITS that is EXACTLY what he has been doing the whole time.
No wonder he was taking some redneck strapping C4 to his tailgate as analogous of a WW2 anti-aircraft shell. A total liar and a FRAUD.
Truly a pathetic loser. Thank you for your attention.
Is there a reason why all sides had anti-bomber bombs with aerial detonation or ground-to-air missile development?
can we get anti-bomber bombs in the game, it sounds fun? :D
