who would have guessed the guy making grok do all his homework dosent fully understand the material
They were flying together and also were a “part of fighter gameplay”, so with a small economic incentive gaijin could integrate them better into ARB
He missed common knowledge that everyone knows because he didn’t get from Elon’s replacement child. Here he is arguing that explosion from inside would make little difference.
Mods should delete his account to spare him the embarrassment. SHAME.
Lmfao you’re typing like trump “THER WORST DEEL IVE EVER HAD HES A LOSER AND A FRAUD, THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION”
Not once did I ever claim my equation was for a shell detonating not on the aircraft skin.
values are not deliberately low, they are spot on exactly for that situation.
redneck strapping About 680g of tnt equivalent of C4 to a trucks 1.2mm thick aluminum door and 1.4mm thick aluminum tailgate to give a modern datapoint to something like an explosive on 1.6mm thick aircraft skin sections of a B17 is a pretty clever workaround, I used to make these very parts for these very trucks, and am quite familiar with how strong and thick they are.
And people agreed, except you, not because it didnt make sense or was necessarily wrong. But simply because it was posted by me, and your ego cannot allow you to admit when you are wrong. Ive been proven wrong a few times here, and Ive admitted it, and corrected my mistakes, and moved on.
You have claimed to possess historical documentation which you dont have
Claimed to know people with these documents which you dont actually know
And deliberately taken sources out of context from documentation posted by me in an attempt to invalidate what I have to say.
This has been nothing more than loud irritating squawking coming from you spamming the exact same 2-3 pictures, and grasping at straws for any little “AHA” moment you can get your grubby little hands on, because at the end of the day, that is literally all you can manage.
You throw a tantrum whenever someone questions your worldview instead of wondering WHY they are questioning your worldview. Especially now when your easy bomber kills are at risk, and you dont like things being difficult, you support MCM irondoming instead of learning how to properly defend missiles, thats proof of your more lazy approach to gameplay and game balance. You want whatever is going to be easier for you to grind, and bombers being RP pinatas when you’re starting out a new air tree is exactly what you need.
1 Like
wth with this thread
1 Like
Some people getting so pent up they start losing sleep over the thought of their game changing. The suggested APHE changes went through the exact same thing
1 Like
coming from a bomber dad lol
Yeah, agree, community is always against any change, but simultaneously curses the developer for years of “no change”. In any game. Good devs should just work as a part-time psychologist to understand what people say, lol.
best part is most of my playtime is in fighters
1 Like
One thing id like to see is the documentation gaijin says they have which promtped these changes in the first place, the 3g and below shrapnel not doing damage to spars and whatnot
1 Like
They said two times that they were looking at images and reports of different bombers of different eras, etc
And made a conclusion that bombers rarely rapidly disassembled in mid air.
Introduced players to a “mission kill” term or something.
and you still suck at them thats unfortunate
yeah u gonna bite or what
Wow look at this PATHETIC LOSER posting pictures of his workplace. That is employment FRAUD!
Truly when bomber mains are sending their people they aren’t sending their best. They’re bitters, exploiters, and AI slop generators. And some I assume are good people. But not this one…oh boy this guy is a real piece of work.
All bomber mains should be ROUNDED UP and DEPORTED from real game modes like Air RB and confined to Mickey Mouse game modes like Air Super Immersion Mode. They should be so immersed in the game mode that anytime they die in the game they have to jump out of a 2ND STORY WINDOW to experience the true EXCITEMENT of hitting the ground.
Thank you for your attention.
POTUS Of Toxic Fighter Mains.
6 Likes
I just think that bombers should be better integrated into ARB and bring better rewards to fighters defending or attacking them…
And this addition/bomber buff is good for that.
we have discussed this, yes, increasing repair and sp costs for bombers and increasing the rewards for killing them, this is something most agreed on
1 Like
bring back the 70ksl b29
Maybe not to THAT degree but more than its sitting at now lmao, 1/3rds to halfway perhaps
1 Like
I thought of another approach, more shaping the gameplay than just a simple reward change:
Long story short, allied planes should have an incentive being near a bomber to collect a reward, and enemy planes - an incentive to attack these groups, as they will get way more reward.