Interesting, thanks!
1 Like
I mean it’s a basically 30yr old design that’s had no changes to the internal armour array in general. CR2 is solely reliant on external packages because all the room for internal armour was exhausted and any change would require a redesign.
This tank is being renamed, most likely to the correct tech demonstrator designation
2 Likes
Is it? Not seen that. That’s good news.
Good to see them fixing Cr3 at least in some parts
Maybe this means they will change the weight too.
they already said that would be fixed in a later update
1 Like
Yes, i thought i already posted it here, but i did not. Weird,
Challenger 3 weight fixed. I presume it will go down to the 62,5, but i can never be sure what shenanigans will happen
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/TmfWqB5WGPMi
2 Likes
Trust me, all i did was use one video. BAE is yet to write to me. I dread the day they will.
1 Like
More changes may come but this is just the initial wave
2 Likes
amen
2 Likes
Hope so
1 Like
Community Bug Reporting System not sure if anyone else has brought this up yet - reloading the gun from the hull rack (~31s) takes longer than replenishing the first stage and then loading from that rack (4s before replenishment starts, ~17s moving a round to first stage, 7.8s standard reload - about 29s in total)
1 Like
I dont think anyone did.
“Reports on historical inconsistencies require additional sources confirming the information you have expressed.”
Guys I need classified documents on the Challenger 3 TD to prove that moving a thing directly to a place should be faster than moving a thing to a different place before moving it to the first place
Edit: here’s a demonstration of the logic at play
Spoiler
Just go and drop by RBSL HQ, they might let you take a video, and maybe give EPSOM specs
/j