I don’t care 5 second or 6 second lol… I will a real challenger before everything xD
10.7 Take it or leave it
I mean if we’re still talking about the lack of the turret spall liner because it’s just a tech demonstrator then I believe that it should also have the internal turret composite removed as well.
Yeah no.
All manual loaded tanks should get +2 sec reload for when they want to keep the ammo compartment closed. Time needed to open and close the doors.
If they want the best reload rate the blowout panels should malfunction
Challenger 3ATD is just a worse turret protection compared to the Leopard 2A6 tank, slower turret rotation speed, clearer thermal imaging, and slower movement speed.😢😢
Poorer protection than Challenger 2 (lack of artillery shield armour, lack of turret Kevra anti-collapse lining, lack of turret tail cabin ammunition protection ability), slower ammunition loading speed, slower movement speed (comparison 2E)😎 🕶️👌😭
The British in the game have successfully developed a worse tank 🤐🤐🤐
It’s a tech demonstrator let’s remove all the composite armor, add back the 1500hp engine give it dm63/73 (whatever round it fires I am not knowledgeable enough) and shed the weight. Britiain will finally have a top tier gun carrier other than the MTTD XD (British cv90120)
4 Likes
Just remove it from the game completely, it’s a busted tank because nothing about it is right or able to be confirmed, there’s more information on the Za-HVM and that not even in game. It’s got a bug report about not having a LWR which has been acknowledged so at this point it’s just an up gun’d challenger 2 with a worse reload and Survivability.
5 Likes
Make your choice
Better turret armor
Better mobility
Faster reload
Spall liners
Non turret ammo rack
50 cal or aps system
Or
Dm53
:o
8 Likes
I’m gonna go with the DM 53 and DM 69
Nice
Hopefully best OP round, like for Leopard 2 140’s APFSDS
so considering the semi recent changes to the arietes and merkavas, im gonna post a comment here to bring this post to the front page since it should be talked about again.
5 Likes
Their decision to not give the CR3TD 5 second reload and raise it to 12.0 is one of the most insane decisions they have ever done. CR3TD with 5 second reload DM53 and a fixed ready rack would have made it a usable glass canon, maybe a reason to take it over everything else, but leaving it at 11.7, when its a straight downgrade most of the time to any of the CR2 and not even foldering it below the BN/2E is just insane.
4 Likes
its a genuine disappointment, and i can see that in the future that if they ever decide to add the actual challenger 3 all that will change is that we will get the commanders mg and blow out panels but nothing else. not to mention that it would probably not get foldered either
1 Like