We don’t want OP we want what it has IRL. That’s the point in us playing this game.
1 Like
Well. They wont accept that report on pen because of how they calculate pen in game
but there is
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/bMbEJftRqiSp
and they’ll hide behind reload rate being a balancing tool but ignore the fact the Japanese tanks have 4 second reload (though not far off the performance of the CR2) and the Abrams have 5 second reloads and are stronger in every respect compared to the CR2
But worth a try at least
Then you also have the big one which is the lack of ERA perforation modeling which would completely mitigate soviet ERA, but alas, that is something they dont model .
1 Like
Yeh but you can convert it. And also, I have put a big report on lower plate spall liner and had no acknowledgment or response.
1 Like
Id try DMing Gunjob with that report
1 Like
I did twice he hasn’t responded.
DM Smin? he tends to be half decent for forwarding reports. Tech mods are voluneteers so Gunjob probably just missed it or forgot
Certainly. And that makes sense. Its their game, they made it, we’re not entitled to whatever we want. But this is beyond that. This is not making the game properly and that we should have right to. Plus, as i said majority nations cry and get stuff reverted. So can we, I hope.
And this is where I feel alone. Other nations have. They do. They will. And it works. Why cant we? Why wouldnt it work for us? “all we can do”. But its not working. I think we need to have faith. We need to try something different.
(IDK who Gunjob is)
From my point of view as ground only players its only been darker and darker times since I joined. I have seen not 1 victory for ground; at least one not major enough to matter. At the very least we could all fight for the same thing at once. Surely like 1000 people (i really dont know how big brit ground community is) all posting about CR3 would get it changed quickly?
For the LWR Someone put a comment somewhere saying it should have it and boom, gone. 1 comment on a post and gone but us, thousands of comments with sources, and nothing.
1 Like
It extends to things like default loadout choices. Why the hell does the FGR 1 and 2 have 2x aim-9D as their stock weapons at 12.0? Why is the F-4JUK at 12 when the F-4S is better in every regard?
I’ve seen you talk about these things before, but I guess I’m just in a venting mood.
1 Like
I got reply out of another mod. But they said things like historical will be less prioritised.
The scimitar and fox had their turret rotation nerfed because somone felt that it was too high.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/RuPCHKHo71e6
yea.
2 Likes
The MOD are very secretive and try their very very best to keep everything hush hush unless they want people to know. Getting facts about vehicles is literally impossible for most things, most of the Chieftain and Challenger 1 is still classified and tbey will still refuse questions on it.
Anyone who’s made it through the APDS BRs is already one of the more stubborn or skilled players, thats why Britain just doesnt get played much. So we just dont have that community weight behind us. Things like the Leopards are in most trees and the Abrams is in the US TT which is the most popular, so when they complain, gaijin listens. But the CR2. Not many people play it and those that do, do well. So to Gaijins stat balancing, it doesnt need fixing.
Its a real shame.
Tech mod, does a LOT of the reporting/nudging of reports for British stuff. Mostly air though.
1 Like
I read into the IRL charge bins and they should basically be immune. ‘BUt FOr BallANCe wE cAnt.’ At the very least you can make it better!!
I noticed L27A1 postpen does suck as well. Like terrible. Might go back to L23A1 cause that is a nuke shell or try L26 and see how that does out of the L30
They will nerf east with 1 comment or complaint but takes 3 years to buff.
1 Like
and FA2 and F3 Late still have 9Ls stock, but the ICE for example has 9Li
1 Like
@nbeckberger
Hindsight bias.
Gaijin likes all the vehicles they add, and Challenger 3 TD originally had features Gaijin thought was true: Blow out panels and 1500HP engine; Bug reporters proved those were wrong and Gaijin fixed the errors which reduced its BR.
In HINDSIGHT the other Challenger 3s made are better, but that’s hindsight.
Compare the other Challenger 3s to the Challenger 3 TD on introduction, not the current Challenger 3 TD.
Challenger 3 production will take the longest to research, and other prototypes are unknown in research time, so be patient.
The harder the info is to get the longer development will take.
What is it supposed to allegedly be over 622mm at 2km? [NATO 60 degree plate test.]
And can you prove it via Willi Odermatt’s equation?
ERA is supposed to be 3000mm against HEAT?
I just unlocked the jaguar and tbh, I’m not going to bother with it. No stock flares or missiles or bombs at 9.7 just seems a bit much and not fun. :/
L27A1 you can read here:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/bMbEJftRqiSp
The ERA should be a lot stronger, you can read here:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/hUjNza9bvJyP
But there are loads of other reports for the external armour
1 Like