While those would be cool, I personally want a 10.0 line-up for france. Even with that 10.0+ is getting heavily compressed so I’m starting to not like 10.0+.
I’ve been farming the Challenger 3 TD for so much time. I feel like I’ve been scammed. I should have unlocked the 2E first…
Save yourself the time and pain and just not play the Challengers.
1 Like
I agree but also where did you get this graph? It’s great.
I made it myself.
I’m too deep in this hole already, only 140k from it.
Yikes. I pray for your sanity.
i rpeorted it dw
Hey @Smin1080p , errr, it does no such thing, only options are 6A and 9A and they appear identical so you cannot tell visually.
They closed my reports, citing the parliamentary question :)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Lb9RjfLjvSOp
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/NQHChlEpZtgD
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Oo23r6Q0Occy
the ATD has no mention of an engine change, its purpose was to show what you could do with a challenger when you put a new shiny turret on it, which then evolved into the Challenger 3 programme. Because all HAAIP vehicles are being converted into Challenger 3’s, the ATD wouldnt make sense to have recieved this package.
dont argue with him. He is known for wierd statements and his own logic. Waste of time.
tbh would be more relevant if it had DM63
2 Likes
Identical performance.
IM… which would make the lack of blow outs less serious
actually slightly less
Except at least not every single mantlet penetration would lead to ammo detonation insta-death as it does now.
if there is ONE tank in the game that needs and deserves DM63 from a gameplay perspective, it’s Challenger 3 (TD). It is also the shell it was historically tested with as well.
Maybe, if Challenger 3 (TD) gets DM63 and its 5 second reload… MAYBE, then it will become a vehicle worthy of being a tech tree’s pinnacle.
4 Likes
Brit players go through that progression faster than an Alcoholic gets through a bottle of w(h)ine
1 Like
I’m not sure what DM63 would bring to the table in War Thunder though.
Same kinetic performance as DM53, even DM73 would still be extremely similar with only a minor 10mm penetration increase via 30 m/s higher velocity.
I’m doubtful that Gaijin would model the resistance to detonation of this type of propellant.
1 Like
It would bring A LOT to Challenger 3 (TD)!
As of now, each and every single shell that hits the mantlet insta-kills Challenger 3 (TD) via ammo detonation because it has all the ammo stored right behind the mantlet with no blowout panels.
With DM63, the survival chances would increase dramatically and allow Challenger 3 (TD) not to immediately die as soon as it’s shot that once in a while, hahah.
DM63 for Challenger 3 (TD) would basically be its own form of “blowout panel”, to make up for the lack of one; and it would actually be even better for this tank, since only the destroyed ammo would disappear and not the whole rack. But since each mantlet hit lands on the ammo, it’s only fair.