Challenger 3 MBT - Technical Data and Discussion

gaijin: yeahhhh about that

Hmmmm u think DM53? DM63?? DM83???

Not sure what yiu are on about here.
But u skipped the DM73.
Besides that the rounds available are ourely balancing factor and do not count as a feature.
Else geemany would be rinning around witz DM63/73 since some time

The document cited is a patent published in 2023 (EP3990853 B1). There shouldn´t be any problem. If you confirm that from your side, I can share the link.

1 Like

image
funny

I’ve never understood it with British marketing in the military sector. Companies almost do what the Russians do and say that it can do more that what it can actually do, or it can be achieved but at such a high price it would make even Ferrari blush

its more like military itself had no money after the USSR collapsed, so there was no budget to upgrade

There was money but people (especially the poms) didn’t want to see it. The UK is a pit of money and managed but dolts that are only concerned about filling their and their country’s pockets

Was wondering: Is there a recent CR3 prototype that has the upgraded transmission, 1500hp engine, LWS and blowout panels that we can prove are on it and if so, can someone make a suggestion for it soon.

1 Like

Just made one, its near enough a copy of the original one i made which was converted into an ATD suggestion.

Can you send a link? I would like to read it

It hasn’t been accepted yet

1 Like

I have a suggestion for something (I can’t remember what anymore) and that has been waiting for approval for months

But DM me if your suggestion is approved and I’ll be the first to vote and say how much I want it

1 Like

it might have been denied, they just never tell you
best u can do us write a suggestion mod and ask for its status

2 Likes

I was think of writing a report request on the bug report site but never got around to it and now I can’t remember what my suggestion is about or what it was but a memory does come to mind of a SA pack for Britain that AFAIK (or remember) would have included the SA Sherman IIa, Sherman Firefly with APDS, a SPAAG like the Ystervark and a M10 that SA operated in WW2

if i remember right mods still see everything you suggested, the threads exist just never published:

They can copy paste the text for you to reword as well

I think that if had to release that forum then I would embarrass myself badly from how bad the whole thing is but if the suggestion mods can atleast see it, I’m happy

1 Like

Impressive, very nice.

I wish you would all stop talking utter nonsense on this thread tbh. Stop talking about the 3TD that’s in game that’s not what this thread is for. Stop debating whether or not the challenger 3 should or shouldn’t get such and such feature and just stick to the facts or new media and updates from RBSL or the ATDU. This thread is supposed to be a technical data megathread. Take a note from the challenger 2 technical data thread. If you have to discuss stuff then discuss the stuff we already have info on, for example we know that it is going to get an APS we just don’t know exactly which model so talking about that makes sense

Sincerely an actual Brit that wants gaijin to take us seriously lol