What do u mean free to be shared?? If ur asking if they public yh i mean I literally went on X and saw it and saw it on another forum too.
The fact you can find something online does not mean it is not classified
Are they declassified. Stuff that gaijin can’t use or host appears online all the time.
You need to provide proof of de-classification
Ill delete it to make sure. Idk how classified info will be able to just be posted like that on public sites.
:sparkle: idiots :sparkle:
edit: idiots with info they probably shouldnt
Many things end up in the internet.
You can for example find Eurofighter Manual, and that is very much classified.
do i wanna ask what it was about?
Cr3 stuff
isnt the Challenger 3 MBT lacking it’s Spall liners?
Not quite. The turret most likely lacked them (we do not have data), as it was not a production, conflict based one, but a demo one.
shouldn’t it also be subject to “what if”, Example the Yak-141 getting IRST despite never having it nor weapons fitted + avionics fitted. But a “What If it had the avionics etc fitted”
shouldnt the Challenger 3 be subject to this too?
1 Like
Thats up to Gaijin to decide.
1 Like
difference is yak141 was never finished, while the tech demonstrator is a step topwards the chally 3.
there will be a chally 3 with all the features
Something being online (anywhere) does not make it safe or legal. Please check and post clear proof of declassification before you share any source that may well have restrictions: Source Material: Restrictions on Classified and Export Restricted information (“Military Restrictions”)
Its on you to provide proof before you post something. If you dont, you risk your account being banned and all content deleted. We will never use or allow sources without clear proof of declassification.
4 Likes
gaijin: yeahhhh about that
Hmmmm u think DM53? DM63?? DM83???
Not sure what yiu are on about here.
But u skipped the DM73.
Besides that the rounds available are ourely balancing factor and do not count as a feature.
Else geemany would be rinning around witz DM63/73 since some time
The document cited is a patent published in 2023 (EP3990853 B1). There shouldn´t be any problem. If you confirm that from your side, I can share the link.
1 Like
funny
I’ve never understood it with British marketing in the military sector. Companies almost do what the Russians do and say that it can do more that what it can actually do, or it can be achieved but at such a high price it would make even Ferrari blush