Challenger 2s were never deployed to Afghanistan. Only Iraq
atleast on the challenger 3 its supposed to have basically the same FCS/targetting system as the Leopard 2a8 standard, so like absolute top notch
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Clear marketing lie.
true, give it 200 horsepower
Is this free to be shared?
What do u mean free to be shared?? If ur asking if they public yh i mean I literally went on X and saw it and saw it on another forum too.
The fact you can find something online does not mean it is not classified
Are they declassified. Stuff that gaijin can’t use or host appears online all the time.
You need to provide proof of de-classification
Ill delete it to make sure. Idk how classified info will be able to just be posted like that on public sites.
:sparkle: idiots :sparkle:
edit: idiots with info they probably shouldnt
Many things end up in the internet.
You can for example find Eurofighter Manual, and that is very much classified.
do i wanna ask what it was about?
Cr3 stuff
isnt the Challenger 3 MBT lacking it’s Spall liners?
Not quite. The turret most likely lacked them (we do not have data), as it was not a production, conflict based one, but a demo one.
shouldn’t it also be subject to “what if”, Example the Yak-141 getting IRST despite never having it nor weapons fitted + avionics fitted. But a “What If it had the avionics etc fitted”
shouldnt the Challenger 3 be subject to this too?
Thats up to Gaijin to decide.
difference is yak141 was never finished, while the tech demonstrator is a step topwards the chally 3.
there will be a chally 3 with all the features
Something being online (anywhere) does not make it safe or legal. Please check and post clear proof of declassification before you share any source that may well have restrictions: Source Material: Restrictions on Classified and Export Restricted information (“Military Restrictions”)
Its on you to provide proof before you post something. If you dont, you risk your account being banned and all content deleted. We will never use or allow sources without clear proof of declassification.