Yet another way in which they neglected Challenger 3 (TD);
They made a new, larger and more detailed L/55-L/55A1 module model which they gave to every Leopard tank…
Yet they couldn’t even bother to copy-paste it into Challenger 33 (TD) lmao
If you are wondering, tne new gun module model is actually a big deal; since it’s much larger, it’s significantly better at catching spall and even absorbing entire shots. But I guess Challenger 3 (TD) could not even benefit from that.
I just made a bug report, but I don’t expect it to get anywhere.
I’ve already removed it from the lineup and added the base challenger 2 instead, less chance of getting ammo racked and a spall liner. Yeh the round isn’t as good but who gives a **** when you’ve got the same mobility, better survivability and you’ve gotta aim for weak points still anyway.
I know you want to have an accurate game, but your stealing from a player base that has nothing to begin with. Its like beating up a homeless man and pulling the metaphorical rug under him. All because he happens to be in the same area as you.
Gaijin likes to selectively chose sources to make Britain suffer the most :)
The lack of blowout panels wouldn’t be an issue if it had DM63/DM63A1 (as they don’t explode when hit), it never fired DM53 in real life.
Let’s not forget that the damage and visual model don’t even fit, meaning the tank’s turret face is noticeably less angled than it should be…
This part too, the plates aren’t accurate to the visual model, they’re at weird angles and phase through eachother too. It isn’t even symetrical to the other side, so much for a “rework”
