Nice, thank you
hows the l27a1 report going for whoevers working on it?
Im currently going to be travelling tonight, so I won’t be able to do it today.
If anyone else is willing to that would be good, if not I will take a look tomorrow.
If anyone has any information please share it here :)
1 Like
i would help but i never done it before but some pretty solid info is in the cr3 thread
Can’t wait to see this again next year.
3 Likes
Why are they adding something that never existed in the first place?
1 Like
Gaijin. Are you actually insane. The challenger is one of, if not THE WORST top teir mbt. And for the sake of balance, you decide to pull the existence of a turret basket out of nowhere and slap it on something that does not need it. We are at the point where gaijin is fabricating information to nerf vehicles that are already terrible. Why? As seen below, there is no turret basket. There is no Easter bunny, there is no tooth fairy, and there is no queen of England!
7 Likes
Wait till you see the model and hitbox missalignment in Challenger 3 TD, it has a sharper angle of turret where they just copy and paste hit box from Chally 2 instead and made it the exact same value in the new turret, it’s been accepted almost two years ago lol
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/mWd3XAjD2kZu
And now adding something that doesn’t even exist irl? Lovely innit
You see, there is actually a basket. It’s just that pommies are so short, it doesn’t stick out from the turret, obviously.
Yeah but the dev server looks nothing like what it should
Is there any chance this could still be cancelled? To be honest, since it’s only on the test server, if they push this change through, I’m afraid they’ll keep adding even more unrealistic and questionable features in the future.
By the looks of the implementation on the dev server… its not too bad, It could be a LOT worse, and is perhaps a somewhat reasonable interpretation
But the biggest issue is that nothing else really got fixed. Like missing spall liners. Which just leaves the tank even more vulnerable than it was before.
So I wouldnt necessarily have issue with the currently proposed internal damage model overhaul if they actually overhauled the internal damage model to include missing spall liners and addressed the missing armour. Then finish off with actually fixing things like the ready rack and we’d end up leaving this update actually better than before
6 Likes
It can always be binned after or during the dev server. But it can always get worse
if they really wants to sell the pack
looks exactly the same thickness btw
1 Like
we need @Smin1080p_WT to try help us like he did with the engine buff and get atleast the ready rack and spall liners because smin if you read this i know your probably dont have a say but if you have played the challengers you have to agree this basket is gonna make them practically useless at top tier
If it was going to be fixed, it would have been. They know about the issues, they just don’t care to fix them.
This is either because “It’s too hard” or more realistically because it would upset the status quo and not direct people towards better monetised trees.
2 Likes
truth
If they’re willing to nerf the British vehicles, I’m honestly afraid of what they’ll target next.
1 Like