Noble attempt. Shame it will be in vain.
I was only reminded of these tanks’ ingame existence because of this post lmao.
12 Likes
Yeah… but its a google doc, so I can C&P it every major update
Took 2 years but they finally fixed SRAAMs
18 Likes
Outstanding move! Hopefully this time it will work so that the Challengers aren’t entirely pointless as they currently are.
8 Likes
Also @Morvran 2nd to last link, barracuda camo netting, that link takes you to the Enforcer RCWS… https://web.archive.org/web/20180301044344/http://www.leonardocompany.com/documents/63265270/66465238/mm08109_Enforcer_RWS_LQ_.pdf
3 Likes
Oh haha
2 Likes
Perfect thank you
2 Likes
+1 for chally 2 !!
4 Likes
But the 1 i linked is SolarShield which is different to Barracuda. Barracuda is already on the TES in game on the turret face and small areas, not the full cover. Just incase u get confused cause u have it named as barracuda, different but similar. SolarSheild better i think.
3 Likes
Great initiative. I hope Gaijin realizes its mistakes and focuses some updates solely and exclusively on fixing bugs, game errors, and vehicle errors. It seems like this is something it has been neglecting for years, focusing only on adding new vehicles, adding more bugs, and then fixing the most insignificant ones.
3 Likes
I hope this gets listened to but i fear it won’t.
3 Likes
I know not much is known about these rounds. But, the british army did procure L28a1 and the L28a2 round was being tested. Perfect opportunity to increase the penetration as gajin can simply make up the numbers for now until we have actual data. I know people push everything must be accurate but sometimes we need to recognise this is a game and not a simulator.
1 Like
Whenever it’s up to Gaijin, they always go for the worst and lowest possible ones.
1 Like
Not only the Challenger 2, but also the Stormer HVM has many problems that have not been fixed, the most important of which are the IFF and radar interface.
4 Likes
L28 is functionally L27 but tungsten iirc so I wouldn’t expect anything of it.
As far as I understand it is as you say, the L27A1 being the best bullet for the Challenger 2. That is why it was decided to make the Challenger 3 with the German cannon, because the British cannon with separated ammunition has already reached its limit, something similar to what happens to the Russian and Chinese 125mm cannons, which having separated charges does not allow them to use long APDS-FS, so there comes a point where they are at a disadvantage.
Not exactly the cannon. L27A1 shot is the exact length of the CR2’s turret stowages. The turret couldn’t handle bigger shells - that’s why CLIP(?) ((the one that originally got the L/55 on a base CR2 turret)) only had something in the range of 14 rounds.
Consequently, this isn’t quite true. A turret redesign without a gun swap would have allowed for longer darts. The problem was definitely not money standardisation!!!
1 Like
I really think that if they wanted to they could have made a complete round with the Challenger gun, since the Challenger 3 with the L55 uses the same turret as the Challenger 2, which indicates that a complete ammunition can be handled inside that turret. What I believe is that the British decided to go for improving their Challenger with a more than proven gun instead of risking making their own anti-tank gun design.
As I told you before, in the case of the Challenger, it’s probably a matter of saving money on developing a cannon, taking advantage of a good one, with room for improvement and well-tested.
1 Like
challanger 2e 2325 hp
black knight 1886 hp
And the challanger 3 td, as you can see 1860 hp.
I went in the dev server and checked myself.
Your in Arcade
2 Likes