Look at the type 10 armor and there you have a representation
No, its a challenger 2 turret suspended in the air on its side with the front facing the left of the frame.
Just noticed that the Composition of the turret armour and the actual damage model don’t add up. The composition states a 60mm backing RHA plate followed by a 110mm CHA plate but the backing plate is only 50mm and the cast plate is part of the entire turret piece that’s labelled as 38mm so idk what’s going on there.
1 Like
Got a thickness for the Cast plate, Impact angle of 60 degrees gives a thickness of 200mm, therefore the plate is only 100mm thick instead of 110mm.
Welp. Are you going to report it?
1 Like
Yeah will do, just wanted to share it first
1 Like
Unfortunately it doesn’t look like the Premium Challenger 2 did too well, nobody is playing it, so doesn’t look like we’ll get the backlash of angry people realizing just how bad the Challenger 2 is comparatively
3 Likes
Im burned out when it comes to reporting recently, i just do follow ups
The cats long out the bag, there are tibetan monks who havn’t seen a human being in years who know Challenger 2 suffers in game.
1 Like
I saw one person in it and they got bullied in chat
People already know its a s**t tank in game so there’s no chance anyone will buy it in the first place. unless the long list of issues are fixed i can guarantee this time next year the chally 2 will either be moved to a pack in the store with bonus GE to entice players or removed entirely due to lack of sales just like other premiums in the past.
2 Likes
I know I just wanted to believe :(
is their no spall line on hull other then the front CR2 E
no, all CR2s and the CR3 have the spall liner on the ufp
bit crap
yeah and it makes little sense, especially given the emphasis on increasing side and lower hull protection over the last 2 decades. But I don’t know of any images to prove otherwise.
1 Like
no, it wasn’t where did you get that from?
It’s because everyone knew how bad it would be.