ah it at least got passed.
@Gunjob do you have any idea if these armor holes
are worth reporting or it nothing will be done because of the leak a few years ago?
are worth reporting or it nothing will be done because of the leak a few years ago?
That is what my report is about. It should be looked with all the Cr2 reports in the near future
Nothing to my knowledge should’ve changed based on leaked information.
6 Likes
i meant more the opposite that certain areas are now not allowed to change since that might leave gajin open to legal problems
Erm don’t know. Largely if it’s a new armour hole I’d consider it a bug.
It’s sadly not new it has been there since the dawn of time as Devils bug report shows
Anybody have anything proving the CR2 mantlet has a plash guard by name?
It has been here long before i reported it, since 1st Cr2 addition
Its not, it was reported quite a while ago.
Ahh I thought it was new.
9 Likes
I think those are the round gun trunnion parts of the base part of the turret under the armor. That honestly makes sense.
I cant find the picture but @Fireball_2020 knows what im talkin about
I think it was fireball that sent me a pic of the challenger 2 turret in production w no armor on it u can see the mounting holes for the trunnions, theyre large and cylindrical
Oh, well then that armor hole is def a bug in live, since the trunnion hole is local and doesnt extend back to the cheek plates.
That’s also not the pic ive seen, but it works.
I already reported that, but it was passed as a suggestion
There better be a devblog for the cr2 like the abrams because this is honestly rediculous.
Not even mentioning the 11 T series overperforming ufps. Now including the T-90M.
Its literally all broken 😂
1 Like
You talking about this? The one that fireball sent
1 Like
Ummm…no thanks. I don’t even want to begin to think what Gaijin would do with Ajax.
Shudders
1 Like