Challenger 2 needs to be brought to developers attention

[Hartsy1]

[FlyingOstridge]

The issue with it is the lack of an updating FCS. There’s too long of a gap between range findings to reliably hit a moving target. Definitely a VT fuze would make the world of difference

[Toxindragon]

Airburst = / = proxy

[Hartsy1]

Ohhh i see the airburst is just timed. not a proxy airburst >.>

[Hazardish]

Proximity HE is a very unique round that doesn’t have much purpose (for tanks, artillery use it to detonate above ground)

The American M830A1(yes I know it’s heat) is unique because it was designed to also hit helicopters which is why it has proximity fuze. It’s also a sabot to increase velocity.

Don’t expect proxy fuze HE any time soon in game and irl. Even the American new AMP round afaik doesn’t have proximity fuze.

[DevilO6]

A little topic i made

Challenger 3 (Technology Demonstrator) discussion

A topic to discuss the Challenger 3 (Technology Demonstrator) on the dev server of update “Air Superiority”

[Tim_TeaDrinker]

The Russian community decided to die endlessly on Challenger 3 (p) in order for the statistics to drop. Perhaps this will draw the attention of developers to the problem of the tank.

[DevilO6]

Wdym by that?

[Tim_TeaDrinker]

Because the developers are guided by the statistics of the effectiveness of tanks. If the statistics are too low, the developers will improve the tank.

[DevilO6]

Oh, that’s what you meant. I just did not understood what you meant by it. I guess ill join it. Die to Bots!

[Tim_TeaDrinker]

Spoiler

Poor turms

[thepoopsmith1]

any links would love to read

[Tim_TeaDrinker]

Spoiler

Единая тема обсуждения наземной техники Великобритании - #1053 от пользователя Stinger117 - Наземная техника - War Thunder — официальный форум

Единая тема обсуждения наземной техники Великобритании - #1066 от пользователя Timkaru - Наземная техника - War Thunder — официальный форум

Единая тема обсуждения наземной техники Великобритании - #1070 от пользователя RuV230900 - Наземная техника - War Thunder — официальный форум

Единая тема обсуждения наземной техники Великобритании - #1080 от пользователя Stinger117 - Наземная техника - War Thunder — официальный форум

Единая тема обсуждения наземной техники Великобритании - #1081 от пользователя Tapoz_Green - Наземная техника - War Thunder — официальный форум

[warhead_beast]

We could push for DM 63 alongside the 2A7V thread. It would be way less explosive if hit and give the Chally 3 a bit less chance to spontaneously combust

[As_H3]

It’s unlikely to get any better ammo because they use it as a balancing tool… Good luck trying to convince the snail that the CR3(P) is not balanced right now

[warhead_beast]

DM 63 apperantly doesn’t have a huge increase in pen

From the 2A7V thread

[Mytho-GR1]

But less likely to go boom when hit

[SuTa_basuto]

@Smin1080p

Suggestion reports can be made for new ammo. That’s absolutely fine. This report however was claiming the current loadout was incorrect (which it isn’t as it’s a balance choice) and had only one invalid source.

Providing the report is properly a suggestion and has valid sources, it’s entirely fine to make suggestions.

you can make a report on it

[As_H3]

But it has an increase, therefore would buff the capabilities. We’re getting CR3 (P) live in it’s current state, years of playing Britain has convinced me of this

[SwingfireOP]

No doubt. It’s going to be released a buggy mess like the other challengers and it will stay that way.

At this point, I’d be surprised if they even give it a spall liner.

If the challengers and chieftains don’t have their spall liners when everyone else gets them, I am going to be exceedingly pissed off.

This upcoming update is turning out to be a bit of a crossing of the rubicon for gaijin. But of a disaster this one lads.