Yes and no
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/aAFRgfGiOKLl/nOCqd8ZScktz
I’m here for my usual update and read through of the thread, is it safe to assume the Devs are huffing copium from the reserve that expired during tsarist Russia?
1 Like
Just dont play the Challenger 2 anymore they made it worse lol because as we know tank design actually peaked with the leopard 2 and T80 and Relikt
1 Like
it’s Gajin man… i have played Enlisted, Star Conflict, Warthunder (10 year). It’s always same issue, Gajin want money money ~~.
“Sell Ship buffed and nerf all SHIP free. all player buy the tank, ship, unit buffed” money money~~
rework a tank for the poor players? nhaaa, there is just some players in challenger
normal behaviour for a F2P game company. damn I feel guilty for spending 500 ge on one bush
i think thats the feedback theyre realy looking at lol. the number of OESs they sold.
Put the GMG on it and you’ll see it sell.
idk… if i was a new player looking for what tree to start and looked at all the premiums on the game i would either go russia or german/sweeden
I never bought premium, I grinded the UK tree since it got added up to the top. I know the pain of the grind xD. I just don’t accept that most premium tanks cost as much as and AAA game, premium time is also a bad deal for me, because I ain’t got much time these days, so by paying for 7d of premium, I would use it for a few hours.
LoL Gaijin on the one hand wants to make money from British players but on the other hand doesn’t want to give British players a good game experience. Why are OES sales poor? Would Gaijin not know that? Who wants to spend 10,000 GE on a scrap? Gaijin’s face makes me sick, and the various so-called response/repair collections are just fooling players, but the challenger’s core problem so far has not been solved, he is still a garbage tank
Im a fan now TrickZZter isnt even translating the dev’s comments for us so we have to do it ourself on the bug reports.
For instance on this report Community Bug Reporting System
“When talking about a rotor thickness of 400mm, the player does not take into account the fact that 400mm is the maximum size achieved at one point. At the same time, the report does not contain any evidence for the theses that the player states.
Closed, no error”
4 Likes
This links don’t work.
Thats how it works, probably if he doesn’t translate them because some parts could miss or misunderstood, just use a translator its not that deep.
1 Like
“Im too lazy to open google translator, so im going to ask a tech moderator to personally translate a Russian response, with google translator on the most case, because i don’t want to spend 20 seconds, also i’d want to take the risk of losing important informations on the process because 80% of the EU tech moderators here don’t talk Russian probably, so they cannot give me an accurate traduction.”
Have a good day.
My god i hate this
The mantlet in wt is 300-330
Don’t
No
Yeah don’t ?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4mQq8HZowwAs
“the shots in the screenshot are fired at that part of the tower where there is no composite and there should not be
Not a mistake. In this case, the shelling is carried out in a weakened zone where there is no combined armor”
Love gaijin just saying yeah there are massive holes in the CR2 turret face because uh we believe so
Its like this on the majority of CR2 reports since the remodel, basically gaijin stating they think its so poorly armoured yet so heavy it makes a king tiger look effective for its weight.
3 Likes