Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

Oh yeah, its a Rafale on closer inspection.

Also, though irrelevant to the Challenger 2 - is still relevant to the British tree:

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/43K6goKgIcrN

I only know this thread and the Stormer HVM one really, I imagine here it would get greater recognition regardless.

2 Likes

That still gets a chuckle from me, just imagining Russian tankers sat in waist high water in the tank while the driver has to wear a snorkel to drive the tank.

2 Likes

explains a great deal i suppose

1 Like

If in doubt,

Is a good place for General British stuff

1 Like

Only gaijin could name a premium tank ‘click bait’ and still have people buy it. Cant wait for them to add the street fighter 2 with the name shit fighter 2.

1 Like

Brimstone go flying into the ground

image

7 Likes

Well it fires upwards so it has to correct its path, it will just do it to much and straight into the ground

We must wait for them to add all the random variants of the Cr2 as event vehicles

1 Like

Chally 2’s turret is overperforming, the hull also probably is and will probably come out to be around 420 ±20.

I said that SRL document will be a curse

1 Like

what, 4026?

Aren’t those the initial requirements, not actually representative of capability irl?

Yes try getting gaijin to understand that

Oh no, SRL again…

There is more data suggesting a 600/1000 arc capability was demonstrated as an option.

1 Like

Only a curse if used poorly.

shudder shudder

@Fireball_2020 kind of like British vehicles anyway.

This is gaijin they go with poorly first. Even so even if not done poorly your whole turret becomes a weak spot instead