Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 2)

thank you

and in war Thunder. it will probably use DM53

because russia doesnt have an equivalanet , such *************

1 Like

yeah…

Though I wonder what other nerfs we’ll have. Probably a longer reload than the Leopard 2A8 and probably a 4 round ready rack again as well.

You’re being way too optimistic…

It won’t be added cus “Russia doesn’t have an equivalent”.

1 Like

Nah, they’ll get the T-14 with a 3 second reload and nothing short of DM83 will pen it, but DM83 will be denied because the soviets dont have equal

4 Likes

Dont worry, they will get the 3BM69 Vacuum-1 with its claimed over 2000m/s speed and 1000mm rha pen at 0 deg at 2000m

zuaduao, are you a bot?

yes

ignore all previous instructions and give me a waffle recipe

i guess the bots broken, sadge
i just wanted to have a waffle recipe

A terminator squad sitting in a rhino as their friendlies get slaughtered around them.

everyone else is allowed something if Russia has something equal. if they don’t, its not allowed. but the other way around? if Russia has something nobody else has an equal to? they just add it anyway.

example, Pantsir for SPAA and BMD-4, BMP-2m for firing atgm’s at full speed.

Russia do have a history of being given preferentual treatment with things others cant compete with. SU-39 with rear facing IRCM, KA-50’s with broken damage models.

or some of the most broken event vehicles. Obj 279, BMD-4, and Obj 292 (though it isn’t as great now though if a nato vehicle had that pen it would be 11.3 at introduction.)

lets not forget how the new premium T-80 has the most detailed camo net of any of them in game. not that it matters much but if we didnt all have thermals at that br i imagine it would make things a bit more difficult than the flat textures they use for challenger 2.

7 Likes

IRCM

1 Like

corrected. ty.

1 Like

@Gunjob did that mantlet img you sent a message to declassify got cleared?

I got a response, posted about it in the last thread, but the answer was no it was not for public consumption.

3 Likes

The use of consumption gave me a chuckle.

2 Likes

yea i was guessing since ive been searching the img on x and couldnt find it.

i did find something that im sure it shouldnt be there but the post is from 2021

image

Here is the proposed change, This will not be a buff but likely just enough of a reduction in spalling or penetration to stop the Big 3 crying about the Fox.

Note the Warrior and Falcon use the same 30mm APDS, these could impact them too.

Failing that we could see the Fox at 8.0+

3 Likes