Is it though?
Doesn’t it lack guided munitions at those BRs.
Not talking avout prems tbh
T10S not really not much to shout about.
Is it though?
Doesn’t it lack guided munitions at those BRs.
Not talking avout prems tbh
T10S not really not much to shout about.
Tornado GR1?
It has 4x MK13 GBUs, 5x GBU-12s (As of this coming major) and the FnF TV-guided PGMs.
Coupled with the better FM, more CMs, better RWR, better A2A self-defence, its a straight upgrade over the Jag.
Its only the 10.0 ones that dont get guided weapons. (Though I really want one of those to use with the 10.3 lineup)
Yeah… That is a fair stance to have though. Im glad I got it when it was available.
I’m just curious here, But has anybody here attempted to create a bug report regarding challenger 2 receiving a turret basket when it doesn’t have one IRL ??
Ive seen quite a few made, but all been rejected. The only change they really need to make though is to remove the turret rotation effect thingy from the base plate. The rest of it is “fine”.
Far more pissed about the attitude towards L27A1 performance or the Trunnion re-re-removal at the moment.
So it’s meant to be a rotating floor. Apparently the floor isn’t in the damage model or something according to a forum mod
IF it gets a damage model, that makes it disable the horizontal drive, then all the T series tanks need to receive their “rotating floor” that does the same, because they also have them in the middle of their ammo carousels the exact same as challenger. Cant make it do it for one and not the other.
This is only a model however, AFAIK its accurate.

Another angle of it above.
Almost any shot into the ammo of a T series tank should disable its horizontal drive, much like what happens on the abrams, leopard, etc. due to the position of the basket to the ammo carousel.
If chally is getting a rotating floor, the T80’s should be getting their whole basket.
of course the documents are gonna lack specifics more than half the information on it is classified and the currently known performance is that L27A1 is underperforming in terms of raw penetration and K5 is still overperforming in terms of kinetic protection but the devs dont seem to want to take notice of that
I think you could park a T-80U and a Challenger 2 on the front lawn of their HQ, fire an L27A1 at said T-80U and they would still claim a lack of information
Lmaoooo ahahhahaha facts. I do actually have a video of this from the yellow and blue country but we cant use them here
Theres also images of the c2 taking hits to the turret cheeks and upper glacis (?) from a T80 and a rocket hit from a helicopter to the commanders hatch. DM if u wanna see.
can you show me? privately that is

Haven’t got the image of the Upper glacis or commander hatch though
Idk if we allowed to post them so i didnt. I remember them saying not Ukraine photos.videos allowed a while back. I had a image deleted for it for dozer blade on C2.
I do. Had these since August ‘24
@CHARM_3 I’m like 95% certain these have been posted multiple times before.
I don’t see the harm in having an image like that
I think they dont want us showing that because of the real possibility of corpses or sensitive military stuff being shown
Check ur DMs for video
I’m not sure when it happened, but driver controls and additional power systems has disappeared from SM CR2.

Best narrative is to render GB as an anecdotal Nation to play.
A lot of times these modules are added on the dev server and then dissapear before live.
It happened on the Challenger 1s too a few patches ago, same on the T80s.
Although Smin did say it was final, but who knows