that’s only if they give it DM63/73 which have the propellant that’s hard to detonate upon hitting it/spalling it. Otherwise that hull ammo will still be a problem.
Also, just gonna ask? Has ANYONE found any solid proof of the challenger 2s composite LFP armor? |
Ive seen a few places mention it, But never solid evidence. (which is not like it would help)
But of ALL the MBTs in this game i really feels like the Chieftains and Challengers both get SO SHAFTED.
The Chieftains get needlessly nerfed and moved up in BR, while having shells that have MULTIPLE TIMES been proven to be Historically inaccurate to the point where L15A3 can barely pen a T-62 at range, the Challenger 1s are stuck in the 10.3-11.3 Russian steam roll hell hole.
The C2s just do not perform as well as they should at all. We are talking about a tank with 1200hp that Handles worse than a Tiger 2 that weighs more, and has half the HP.
Idk if the Chally 1 should be beating down at 9.3-9.7. That would be a nightmare. Now should someone tanks from 9.3 to 10.7 get different shells? Yes! To make the Chally viable.
Didn’t the US build one of the biggest land armies on paper out of Russian tanks just for a bombing range? They must live in a completely different world than everyone in the rest of the world. It wouldn’t be hard to simulate at all.