i believe HO meaans Head On and WW meaans side on or Wing to Wing (i promise i didnt ask chatgpt)
HO makes sense, what would wing to wing infer though?
nevermind makes sense, WW appears to mean side on?
chatgpt says
man ai can give me wonderful infortmation sometimes
yes sir
I dont really trust chatgpt but it’s better than nothing
now it will disable NVD STAB and LRF
me neither but its the quickest thing i can find
theres photos of the previous answers
in all fairness it does show you where the sources are from
and when the power electronic damaged it will disable vertical and horizontal aiming drive,its a serious issue.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/v74dMmcFpRxu
The report is done, I am not entirely happy with it and I think it could be better, but sources are difficult to come by.
This really needs to be reported before the dev server ends, I thought I would just get one out there.
We have a good chance as official documents support our argument, but I do not have access to the full documents for these which gaijin may ask for.
If anyone has additional information, preferrable from SRL 4026 or DEFE 71/1418 about L27A1 please let me know. Any additional sources referring to L27A1 having anti-ERA capabilities would be great too, only primary or secondary please though.
1 Like
to be fair that hit under most of the composite
is this anything?
or this
btw im like the worst person for this but ill still try help if i can
1 Like
sadly neither mention the anti-ERA capabilities of L27A1
2 Likes
unfortunate, i would ping smin to forward it but ive pinged him enough today and i think hes starting to dislike my barrage of british questions
1 Like
I was killed by a Turms with an APDS round through the lower plate
The report for L27A1 hasn’t been denied but they have asked for the full copies (front and rear page) of the documents, that would be SRL 4026 and I guess DEFE 71/1418 too. Although just SRL 4026 may suffice.
The issue is I don’t think the full copies even exist, however, people have been using these extracts for reports for ages without issue. These are very commonly used extracts that we know aren’t fabricated.
@Gunjob Sorry to tag you, but I was wondering if you had any advice about how I could deal with this? Thanks
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/v74dMmcFpRxu
2 Likes
speaking from experience, nothing you can do, they need those informations to verify the documents/books are real / not tempered with and that they are declassified.
You reach peak bug report experience when they start asking you for a whole book with all pages
The issue is these have been used for reports for years now, without the full documents, I dont see why they can’t continue doing so
Flame2512 personally got these images of the documents from the archives
1 Like
the report managers did not ask you for the full document, only the first page and the full page of the information you use
I know, but I’m unsure of if those even exist.
Prior reports have not required them, using the same extracts
what do you need the full page of? or more what does said page look like