this is my report and i was just being dumb, i’ve since learned that the effectiveness of composite is altered as needed to achieve a specific protection value vs KE and CE.
as far as i know you can’t delete reports so my shame persists to this day
1 Like
Smin-“nO We doN’T PlAn oN dOiNg aNytHinG”
6 Likes
Yeah, basically. We got all the fixes we were going to get a year ago?
Knocking the challenger 3TDs reload down to 5.5 seconds should be the minimum they should do for it after taking away it’s 1500hp engine and laser warning system.
Even 5 seconds like the Ariete got. If its going to be a glass canon. At least make the canon part good.
1 Like
Yh i mentioned this aswell and they said im wrong🤷♂️
Thats what that 1 american tanker on TikTok says. Infantry cant be on the side of a tank even with western ERA, Nevermind russian.
1 Like
It would be a nice buff, but 56kph is enough tbh
This is the formula used to calculate max speed
Ignore the values they’re for something else
1 Like
I always wondered where they pulled the very specific values from
That’s interesting
Fun fact the 1500hp CV12 variant revs up to 2500rpm, which gives it a higher top speed.
Spoiler
Though the CV12 in the CR2 is goverend to 2300rpm, if there’s anything to support higher RPMs being used then there’s potential for a speed buff.
CR1 uses a different transmission so would get a different top speed @ 2500rpm
reminder that tn54 goes up to 4.875 reduction before the sprocket
same book says that while the 60kph is the “public” maximum speed, in usual use it goes up to 80 kph
also did anybody bugreport the missing composite plate on the mantlet yet (its the foward section of the mantlet arrow)
1 Like
I swear there was a picture showing it was empty?
not really
1 Like
Clearly marketing lies :P
3 Likes