Why is it structural steel?
High tensile steel
Of what?
I believe he might be referring to the incorrect ammunition rack positions, which is already well documented.
1 Like
is there any reason why they wont model the lower plate spall liner?
1 Like
Because uh um um uh um uh.
4 Likes
toe and side spall liner
do you have any images that show the side spall liner?
Chally’s still… How do id say this? Ah. Incredibly fucking classified beyond belief.
1 Like
You can clearly see that the Spallliner even surrounded the ammunition
it is a challenger 1 I think, however the cr2 and cr1 has a similar hull
1 Like
God I wish they add spall liner to the LFP, that would make it much more survivable.
Most of the time I die in Challengers is because of getting hit there.
1 Like
I don’t know if this is possible, the reason why gaijin refused to restore the CR2 mantlet is that the rotor amor will not appear in the game. But in fact, this armor belongs to the “60mm” armor rather than the frame itself
3 Likes
I can say with some level of certainty this is not a challenger 2, but likely an early 1. Those charge bins don’t line up with a 2.
Sorry to bother you yet again @Smin1080p_WT , but concerning these reports:
I think the developers will find the current ready rack for the Challenger 2s is quite accurate:
From the UK MoD. CP DS-T obviously just being training APFSDS:
And an additional source for fun. ‘Flèche’ meaning ‘arrow projectile’ or ‘APFSDS’:
Hope you’re ready for some Leclerc Nerfs.
2 Likes
ho so thats why it takes so long to fill that ready charge bin. the loader has to get out of the tank, run back to camp and bring 4 more charges.
yea it makes sense
11 Likes
That would account for the 26 seconds - it all makes sense now.
also thank you for bringing that source up again, maybe you can also allert smin how good the armored charge bins are compared to what we have in game.