Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

If the change didn’t achieve the desired result (aka fixe the issue) it’s a new bug… Surely this would be seen through internal testing

You would think. Perhaps a consequence of a horribly rushed update.

2 Likes

What is the current live game version? Not on a computer which has it to check

Internal testing doesn’t happen obviously from what’s happened today 🤣

1 Like

That assumes they carry out internal testing

Here we go :

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/UYy4COcuOpY3

Anything need to be added for it?

1 Like

You summed it up well.

Forward mobility is a tad better, but low speed mobility is still terrible.

So here i go with Cr3 turret cheeks protection

Forwarded, cheers.

3 Likes

I heard you like looking at bug reports.
I made one on Challenger 3 (TD) cheeks protection, would you be so kind to look at it?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/dx2IQMsJF7Nd

Also where fix?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Jl9EUv0QYXC1

Oh, the turret floor is not fixed…
How nice


Another report on the way

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/IPe8YVsovkQh
@Gunjob another report if you would be kind enough to look at it

2 Likes

Done.

2 Likes

On the topic of reports, is there any way of getting the reload from the hull rack reduced? Loading straight from the hull rack somehow takes longer than replenishing first stage + the 7.8s reload

Also done.

2 Likes

Thanks

Likely a soft balance stat like most things reload related.

1 Like

same as CE pretection
image
image

1 Like

HUH? I checked that and it was fine? Let me check