Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

no but for real on the pixel thing, the CR1 UFP backplate is visibly thicker than on the CR2
what’s up with that?

Good news, I found a new bug. An unbreakable tree

Can you point to what you mean?

That?
image

CR1
image
CR2
image

1 Like

Nothing to worry about, just gaijin modelling shenanigans

also the back of the CR1 turret is modeled wrong by a LOT
image

It would probably be easier to list the things about British vehicles that GJN actually got right.

If you can find any 💀

If anything the new CH3 APS will probs look similar to the BK when it comes to integration

Damn they’re making a chieftain 3?

They already did


and here is its APS
image
image
@_Froge

image
image

10 Likes

I hope this has been suggested already

IDK, have not seen anything bout it

Chieftain SID would be a cool addition. Stealth tank

So stealth much wow

3 Likes

Why do the brushes on the left have a different arrangement to the ones on the right

Idk man, setlf

Probably to test which worked better?

It’s a technology demonstrator that went along with missile production to target low visibility, low radar cross section and low IR signiture vehicles.

SID had giant broom bristles on it so on the move it didnt kick up any dust. It was actually pretty awesome and was apparently very quiet