Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

Devil, I am personally holding you responsible for my endevour into baseplates LMAO
I just want to be the ASPRO man…

TES plate with VARMA
f0633400a5b3506b3e267f871339a9f6

Why? I did nothing wrong, @warhead_beast started it


I just gave what i know, you all want into madness working on it

1 Like

Spoiler

Those bolts are holding on the shroud like this diagram and the view is looking from the top down;

Spoiler

1 Like

DL2G, so irrelevant

Where were you, 3 hours ago when I was looking for this exact view LMAO

DL2G, irrelevant sadly

1 Like

We’re gonna run out of posting room lmao

Jesus christ Gaijin

Happy to agree :)
So the issue here now is the current game has the array backwards.
it should be ASPRO mounted flush to the base plate, and the airgap flush with the hull, rather than ASPRO mounted to the shroud, airgap and then plate and hull.

1 Like

still 5k to go
image

I thought it was 5k?

Awesome, right since the last report was not a bugged, and we can agree its 40mm the whole way through, you just want the layout adjusted in terms of order right? If so that’d need a new report.

9999 is the limit

1 Like

Yeah that’s cool by me. 40mm for the steel plate, with ASPRO mounted flush, followed up by a 40mm airgap covered by debris shroud and mounted to hull :)

Report coming your way…

@Gunjob will this suffice? Or i would need another written source? I can get like 3 more SF photos

Yes but those would only be relevant if we had the Streetfighter or Omani CR2E. So save them for the if/when those versions turn up.

Yes there is a laser tag system for CR2, and it has simunitions for the main armament, and irritatingly it’s called TES.

2 Likes

Well, from what i know they use the usual loader mount, that is where the thales site comes in. Saying openly HMG can be mounted.

Gajin please get on that ( i pinky promise that the ATGM launcher is real)