Thanks to the reading i realised 2F and TES have 100 ammo in the mg, while default value for 7.62 is 200 with ability to carry 400 per belt. I will put it in the suggestion, if it does not get through i will make bug report about it.
Going to need some more justification for the gun being able to depress more past that arc. If you can dig up anything more that would helpful otherwise I don’t know how successful the report would be.
2 Likes
That will be hard. Chances of finding CR2 with gun aimed just like that are close to 0, but i will try.
Ok, time to make a suggestion
I made the suggestion. Now i wait if it will be accepted or no.
4 Likes
Those “rails” are bumpers for the main gun. The gun should actually be about to touch those bumpers all the way around. Its a shame the gun limits arent more refined.
Good name for it 😜
Thanks, i wanted to make it at least a little more interesting to click into. Too bad inside is a wall of text :( I can send you a raw on pv if you want. Also i think i should have added photos of irl enforcer, nothing i can do about it now. I have 8 in total, but 6 are small sized :/ so i thought bearly anything can be seen, but on the other hand…
1 Like
You can modify suggestions for I think 15 mins after it’s been accepted. So if you are about you can add to it. Failing that just add a comment with pictures
Tag it If\when it comes through and I’ll add it to the post above
1 Like
I can assure you, if it ever gets accepted, it will be in the middle of the night for me. Sure thing.
1 Like
Just incase anyone is looking at this thread to compile some evidence for changes, heres what Ive found on L27A1 and its anti-ERA capabilities
Page from International Defense Review 1990 vol 23 issue 9 says that a senior royal ordinance representative described the round as ‘not affected by advanced forms of ERA’. Given that it and M829A2 were somewhat codeveloped and M829A2 was specifically developed as a response to Kontact 5, its a fair bet that is what they are talking about here. Not much but its the only hard info Ive been able to find on it
6 Likes
Now we have at least something to throw at the snail when anti ERA gets added to apfsds.
1 Like
A step in a direction i enjoy greatly. However it was passed as a suggestion, so implementation time is X :/
Has to a suggestion I’m afriad. That doesn’t impact it’s turn around though.
While i know it does not impact its turn, that turn is still far away
Suggestions are less important than bugs (obviously), but there is a decent pile of them and even then order of adding them can be shuffled by the devs if they decided something to be added sooner or later.
I don’t think that will go anywhere unless there’s info about the core length of the L27 shell.
It was 660mm if i remember correctly. At least that is the lenght of L29A1 that is the training round, so it should be the same or very close.
@Gunjob i dont want to get into any trouble, so i have to ask. Does providing a name of the article on the government site, that has a pdf that everyone can download but has this
Slapped everywhere (it is crossed out) can get me in trouble or no?
Well, now that i look deeper and deeper into the pfd im seeing more and more interesting things, in the wrong meaning of course, as i have no idae what is classified or not, but it is still on the gov site so im very conflicted.
Or if that is more convinient to you i can send you link to the site in pv. It is about a certain thing during training that CR2 took part in.