Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

image
image
That i guess? That is also what i was using, as Dorchester were always the armor packages for me


Yes, Dorchester is additional armor and is more secretive then the Chobham.

We can see the above mentioned outstanding kinetic protection only in our dreams

Yea, so that is the pont, then
WHY NOT REPLACE CHOBHAM WITH FARNHAM. MoD, why cant you be consistent. Why is MoD the most illogical thing on this earth?

What is the point of replacing any of the names if we know nothing about either of those :D
It’s like slapping M badge to standard BMW

Its not about replacing in game. Im about it IRL. Im a person who, unless sick or during a train of thoughts, like to have everything logical and orderly. So things like that annoy me a great deal. Just the way i am. Dont worry, i will get used to it in like a day or two and never make that comment again

Yeah, your logic is understandable

I dont know if i should take that as a compliment or is this a sarcasm. Like genuine confused

No sarcasm, really :D I also tend to be like that sometimes

1 Like


here is a cool modification idea

That is the 2E mod on normal Cr2
image

Oh just noticed that, didn’t pay attention to it

wait i thought it was better than that. so even BMP2M can kill you there

Yep

And live, the 2F has a hard coded cap on KE and CE protection while the TES doesn’t

I have a favro to ask to any of you. Could someone contact anyone who might know something if these things
image
Are dust covers or they are armor?
image

1 Like

I cannot see why they would be dust covers when there is still way more to be added to the plate (ie the rest of the Side skirt package) lol, also if anything wouldnt the normal Plate itself act as a dust cover?

According to gaijin (bug report respone) they are dust plates. I cant find anything if it is true or no, so i cam to ask yall for help.
Also dust cover on the Europe based Cr2. Doubt it but im not the one who knows what is what

Yeah its a Tricktzzer report where he used Paint measuring tool and just said they were dust plates with no evidence

1 Like

I mean, the thing is i cant prove him wrong untill i have a proof that they are not dust covres. also that part bugs me
image
Clearly attached to the outer plate with nothing behind it, while the block should be seen back there, as it is attached to the flat 40 plate
image
Man it gets harder and harder to make out what is what the deeper you dig.