At this rate it seems like if Chally gets added to World of Tanks it will still be more accurate than what we have here and wargaming Devs for sure won’t post circus level devblogs like “why we think challenger 2 mantlet is made of paper” (Abrams DU hull ref)
3 Likes
@Smin1080p
1, spall liner overlaps with armor
2，The turret casting armor is too far forward
3，Mantlet lacks 50mm armor
4，Mantlet incorrect KE
5，Lack of turret ring armor
6，The length of the rotor is insufficient
7，Wrong ke on the side of the turret
8，The armor section of 30+30mm is too high
9，Wrong positions of gunner and commander
10，CR2E only has one layer of 30mm armor should be 60/30+30mm
11，The rotor is not displayed in armor analysis
12，Lack of armor above the driver
Hello
As Gunjob already mentioned, please make a report for anything new you suspect to be incorrect with one issue per report. Sadly we cant do anything with this list as it is: Community Bug Reporting System
These reports have all been forwarded.
As you can see by the reports, they are still open.
Should we expect all bugs listed above to be resolved by the next patch or at some point in the near future?
Suggestions are always closed off.
As you can see, they have been acknowledged (this means forwarded):
If they have this tag, they have not been resolved and are still open.
If you tell me this during the test server, I will accept it
4 Likes
Has a bug report been done on challenger 2 TES and QES hull add-on armour backplate being 40 to 80mm RHA and not 40mm aluminium ??
Hopefully it’s just that they didn’t get the Chally remodel finished in time, so they decided to revert it last minute hence all the buggy looking mistakes…
I might just be coping though.
they should have said at least a few words about that if that’s the case
4 Likes
The Lack of communication is a little disheartening. makes me think gaijin has no plans to fix the mess we so lovingly call the challenger 2.
1 Like
can i pls hask when the same changes will be done to the cr3 td? bit bad the top tier doesnt get the buffs
What I see is that all these moderators in the forum make me feel like they are not a bridge between player base and developers but rather a defense line of Gaijin so that they aren’t bothered with what we demand to be done in the first place. I have never seen a developer be involved in the forums, not a single time, they are sitting on a different planet, Mars maybe or Pluto
And there are more Civilized ways to express it… we accept all criticism, even negative criticism… if it is done correctly…
What was said is not valid criticism, and offers no Feedback whatsoever to take away from…
2 Likes
Just look at this thread, 7.8k comments and the problems remain the same. For what were all these people trying so much to do lots of due diligence? all this situation is just a nonsense at this point
10 Likes
Even if we write criticism in a good manner, it won’t overcome the firewall that you have constructed and won’t reach the Devs. Today we received no confirmation or whatsoever regarding our concerns with the updated DM
7 Likes