Challenger 2 MBT - Technical data and Discussion (Part 1)

I know finding data on the challenger 2 is basically impossible. But is there really nothing on the nera plates found on the avre, challenger 1 and 2? It seems to be the easiest aider armour to find the values for due to its age.

Steel beasts is a far from accurate representation so don’t even reference it

Which makes it funny that it is probably more accurate, or closer to the actual values at least.

faster reloading, better hull ke is fine

I wish I knew where their stats come from, we then could use those sources here






A 350mm armor has only 110KE

1 Like

Would be 600mm KE if it were a Swedish vehicle.

2 Likes

0.3 is tooo low, 0.5,0.6 will be fine

you should be happy it is 0.3, not the ususal 0.1
image
Oh wait it is, just angled

I think the composite screen used by A7V is much higher than 0.16

image
image
image

50x
image
200x
image
80x
image

280ke

Now take the angle into account and you have a Cr2 hull

Lower than 500ke

We can play our “new” Challenger 2 tomorrow!
@DevilO6

Not true. We do not know if it will be up

TL;DR: that chart isn’t very useful

I realise it’s difficult to see but the UFP composite is turret_06_bottom_dm:

Spoiler

Which is 1.01x KE and 2.05x CE:

Spoiler

image

The LFP Composite is ex_armor_03_dm:

Spoiler

Which is 0.3x KE and 2.0x CE:

Spoiler

image

And finally, the default values for that armour class:

Spoiler

image

A question to you. My asset viewer keeps crashing, do you have any idea why?