Is this okay?
Can you link me the report?
That is what we used.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1jSgt1dXofUi
Sure, but Gunjob noted to me that only 12.7 will be passed
Because too many grenade launchers will cause lags
The bmp-2m can have one but nothing else
i mean if it can be fited with a .50 i would prefer it, if the 40mm cant be an option
B
means bias
Normal coupola can also be fitted with those
But this seems to not be enough… (and i lost the link to it :/)
sadly only the armoured part that you already added
Anyone here has the haynes manual? could you look if there any text pieces regarding an armoured backing plate?
This looks like mountings on both hatches, time to get another report for an extra mg. Its the streetfighter but still shows challengers can mount 2 mgs
Yea, nah. It is not a normal Cr2 version
Ok got it
As long as the mounting is the same it shouldnt matter the variant of the challenger, it can definitely be used as a sourced supporting others.

Heres one with a .50 cal outside the enforcer 2
Would be good to see a pic of the FVC114, the FVC110 on the right doesn’t look like ours.
FVC114 has no picture but states “Licence to develop market and manufacture the FVC 114 was later sold to AEI Systems.The FVC 114 has been trialled on the BAE Land Systems Spartan CVR(T) and by an undisclosed European country on the BAE Global Combat Systems M113 APC.”
Spartan cupola for comparison.
I’ll look into it !!
I suspect, as it states it is on Cr2, it is the loader coupola.
Hey folks
Just woke up so forgive my lack of replies - I’m unconvinced about the whole dust cover thing. I haven’t found any sources saying that’s what it is, nor does it make sense.
Why would it need a dust cover? It sits flush against the baseplate?
@Gunjob do you know if there’s any sources for that dust cover statement or any proof its hollow? The photos only showed exactly what I sent - a solid metal backing plate, but the ticket was closed by TricKKzter?
I’ll pan for some more sources today :)


