Comparing that is a very simplistic way to look at things.
It is missing the numebr of polygons on the barrel, that greatly affects if shells bounce or ricochet off the barrel or not.
Comparing that is a very simplistic way to look at things.
It is missing the numebr of polygons on the barrel, that greatly affects if shells bounce or ricochet off the barrel or not.
That’s cool but we were talking specifically about barrel HP and I can’t go into the CDK and count the polygons on the barrels atm
Sure, but it’s another factor to consider rather than the very simplistic “They both have X HP”.
i actually genuinely wish they never added the orion.
i say things like that over very, very few vehicles, but the orion is at the top spot and i havent even seen anyone else mention it, either because british naval is dead or because its not even worth talking about it.
1.5" is 38.1mm, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the hull were in Imperial measurements.
Good list of vehicles to add, but you missed off this cursed thing i just found lol

It’s got an AS90 turret so surely it should go in the British tree :)
That thing is going to haunt my dreams
My eyes, agh
I wish they’d added it like 2 years ago when Japan got all its 7.0BB’s, or Germany got its 6.7’s. Now its an entirely pointless addition and just a worse Marlborough.
British Naval is pretty dead i’ve seen 1 HMS Hood in my entire time playing naval. But she definitely should’ve been either a Warspite or an R class Battleship.
Now the next step up is the goddamn King George V class 1938 which is to Scharnhorst what Scharnhorst is to Orion lol.

I mean this exists
Oh God I found one on the Vickers chassis

Artillery systems have got to be the wackiest looking pieces of military equipment out there.
Only if they are mounted on hulls that were not meant for them
AS90 on a Chieftain
WAIT ON A VICKERS?
Seems unlikely when they boast a 120mm gun.
[Development] Hull Armor of the M1 Abrams - News - War Thunder a Concerning sign for us.
It basically reads as
No your not getting it unless somehow you get declassified open source info on abrams DU armour configs and what variants this applies to.
"Maintenance
Challenger 2 tanks require two sets of tools, as the hull is built using imperial measurements and the turret is built to metric measurements."
I was a crewman on the thing for 6 years, shows what I remember.
I don’t expect anything different for the challenger 2.
They’ve made up their mind, reality and facts be dammed.
A Cr3 turret floor report, again…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/3ugOc3n4MRHQ
Ahhh fair enough, i mean we was on 1.9mm off XD