I might ask them to model torque…
Good idea! Watch it crash the dragor tho…
I fit a couple of things within, technically, one thing, hahah.
I added three ideas as “mobility features”.
2 Likes
Hi guys this might have been bug reported before but looking at this picture the gap between the inner hull sides and the turret ring seem alot closer than modelled. Additionally the inner hull section isn’t modelled (on the Chally 1 it is modelled) which can sometimes lead to some strange over pressure deaths.
4 Likes
I dont think it was reported. Well, good luck doing one!
Also look for the spall liner
1 Like
Yeah, feels like another tape measure Bovington scenario. They accepted the TOG 2 barrel one so maybe its the way to go.
1 Like
i sent a list of 6 issues
I think this sums it up quite well
8 Likes
Why do i expected that?
I submitted this:
6 Likes
Sums up all the major points
Went with BR decompression, Challenger 2 complete rework, higher focus on bridging the capability gap between minor nations and major nations, and higher rewards in ground battles inline with Air
Well, you all take one very lightly
If they had all the other CR2 gear ratios wrong, I would be amazed if the 2E was correct.
I mean they had the correct gear ratios before but threw in some intermediate ones cause it didn’t work properly in-game
Well, 2E should be different. Nealy C&P from Leo 2. Ok, i unrestimated them, it might have been wrong. Does anyone have Cr2E gear ratios?
I’ll check when I get home, if no one else has them before then
I have seen some on the old forum or reddit, im diving there
I don’t suppose we could suggest that our favourite ‘not a bug’ tech mod is forced to grind out every Challenger 2 from stock - once every week his progress to be reset so he has to work back through them all again - until he recants of his sins and fervently pushes his employers to get the Challenger 2 fixed?
Joking aside - I’ve stuck my survey in. Fixing the Challenger 2 is pretty much the one thing I’ve put down.