which missing armour?
Plate under hull ufp and turret side composite. Hull one is not counted in armor, turret one is missing
2 Likes
the add-ons? gotcha, although you do realise for the ufp it may be counted as part of the composite
God this image really shows the imbalance lol. Look at how small the leopards breech ‘hole’ is compared to the chally.
The difference is if you shoot any other tanks breach it will take out the breach at most. You shoot ours and your killing a few crew members minimum.
Leopards currently do everything the challenger 2s can do but much better aside from a slightly slower reload than the challenger 2 for the first 4 shots and then it’s actually faster than it after that.
the side armour is internally a duplicate btw
2 Likes
i made it before
1 Like
Oh i see. Well, i made it again i guess ¯_(ツ)_/¯
1 Like
i believe most of those crew members kills are due to the holes in the turret cheeks next to the mantlet. you can test it in armour inspector. ive been saying this for years now, most times the gunner and commander get killed in one shot its on the hole in the turret cheek.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/kkQfkzDQwlw7
Flame already report about turret side armour
MOAR, MOAR
If i find anything new i will tag you
This would make a huge difference!
Turret sides: 200 → 250
UFP: 510 > 610
This would make the Challenger tanks significantly more competitive.
1 Like
The issue about that report is that it doesn’t specifically explain the issue ingame, which is the missing 50mm RHA plate behind the composite and which we could witness thanks to CR3’s turret floor srmor big xD