tell that the puma, which pretty much is he immune
either way losat propably is the worst example, being an experiment with ke missles
yes but you called me out that i didnt read it, and you cant answer because the points i amde were right
Funnily enough being fastest ATGMs, it feels like most unaffected one,except times it goes into ground ofc.
I did answer, provided arguments to why your points arent right, you later claimed that i didnt disprove them, thus me saying to look at my original posts.
so your only point is bmpt and kurgaments are not good enough i want sth stronger got it
My point is BMPT and IFVs are not the same as light tanks with tank armarment, thus the spot is free to take by any addition, whether it being some Centauro or any other 11.3-11.7 worth light tanks.
If you want centauro just grind italy tt
1 Like
I plan that on next sales, want to buy OF-40MTCA, VRCC sure is Centauro, but MBTs will be better for grind,I am just talking here in this thread theoretically.
I already have something to grind Italy air TT, italian heli TT only promises to be more interesting in future, just as Hungarian Tt.
If someone says i want Centauro in USSR just because i will be able to grind it - no, i dont have any of Spruts.
they arent exactly the same, but they provide the exact same scouting role in war thunder and those the br gap is filled. There is no special br gap for light tanks with cannons, when someone asks for light tanks they ask for scout vehicles at top tier no matter if it is an IFV or an light tank, because in war thunder they provide the exact same role
That is true, but it still is another playstyle compared to IFVs and BMPTs, so the spot is open, especially considering how BRs having IFVs were never a block to not add a ligbt tank.
With “new” maps you just snipe and scout
yes but that is the point, that is not a need, it is a want. And the wishes of players specialy about sth like this dont need to be fullfilled
Or you play like mbt but faster
Comparing the USSR to Sweden is completely wrong, Sweden has very few vehicles that it could possibly get, therefore it needs to get tested/ captured vehicles in order to remain any semblance of competitiveness.
This statement is absolutely false.
Sweden:
Finland:
Norway:
Can we get a list of helis?
we all already said the T80U is a mistake that should not be repeated, this has no point at all
Suggestions on forums:
A lot of top tier and high tier vehicles are ones suggested by community’s wishes.
A gap is a need, just like 9.3 being highest BR SPAA for Japan, its a gap, a need, not a wish.
Though i would not say its same level of need as proper SPAA for Japan.
there is NO GAP in russia, the gap gets filled by bmpt and korganets simply as that
Just stop please
which are vehicles part of their own nation and development
Yes.
Sweden:
Norway:
For Finland there are no suggestions.