Sorry, correction, Russia was going to buy license to produce it if trials went positive.
no because russia has no gap, those get filled by bmpt and kurgament 25
more reason to be added then italy as additional vehicles
It still does mean they are found in USA as well, and not that rare to meet in battles.
they got removed to be added once israel got added, only those that already own them can play them
Ok, so suggest which could be added to that gap.
If you would then there wouldnt be arguing.
aint my job, besides that russia doesnt need anything when their is the bmpt and the kurganet 25 like i said many times
Then its pointless to argue further, BMPT amd IFVs are not same as light tanks with tank armarment in game. I stand my point.
they are the same in the game, they both have light tank spawn points, both get scouting and reduced spawn points for planes and depending on it drone access. In the game they have the exact same job, you are just to blind to realise that
and still conveniently ignoring that i answered to your original post in the first place and you dont even know yourself anymore what u wrote
Except BMPT, IFV have to waste their time just making sure their ATGM hits, target can just move out of sight by time ATGM is anywhere near, all meanwhile APDSFS would do the job.
If they cant pen tankk frontally with autocannons, they are practically defenseless in CQC after ATGM physics change.
Light tanks dont have either of these problems.
ATGM doesnt damage same as APDSFS, doesnt have same precision and reaction speed. I think thats more than enough to back my point.
light tanks at this point are less defended then IFVS, with umanned turrets you literaly can shoot over obstacles while receiving no damage, the often lower profile allows you to be more sneaky as well
not realy, atgms often can do more damage, besides that it allows for better targeting at moving targets and this isnt event mentioning that the kurganets has new better atgms as well
This is one of the types of vehicles you simply dont get when playing the soviets as there is more of a MBT and IFV focus
There are more unmanned light tanks in game than unmanned IFVs lol.
Profile is nearly the same, IFVs have to play sneaky, hoping to not get detected, while light tanks can battle more.
Only applies to HE effect ATGMs have, light tanks can launch them too, can use HE which will be stronger in HE effect.
Not really after ATGMs physics change, loading APDSFS is much more reliable and less time consuming. Part of why LOSAT is just bad compared to what you can take a 0.3 BR lower.
I dont expect that to ever change
we are talking about future additions which will focus more on unmanned like bmpt and kurganets
sounds like skill issue to me
@Imaflyingturkey btw do you notice how he still completly ignores how i am calling him out that i answered his original post and he complained i should read it and he apparently doesnt even know himself anymore what he wrote
Thats future.
All unmanned light tanks and IFVs are prone to HE effect similarly
I dont play LOSAT.
Have got nuke just yesterday with T62m-1 and BMP3. BMP3 is only exception to ATGM physics, high speed and barrel launch negate half physics changes
Clutch btw
You did answer, though none of your answer were a point that i couldnt argue with.
