The other 2 decided to crash on purpose unfortunately. 1 succeeded and the other failed badly and I was not looking at the sky that time. If I was, they’ed be destroyed before they had the chance.
1 Like
I bet he didn’t even know he could lock air units in third person view, because 0.4 air kill kd in M247 is just impossible, unless he used a bot program of course, maybe we should we report him to get him banned bro
1 Like
Irrelevant when it comes to interference.
I answered you but you seemingly can’t accept my answer.
It is indeed discrimination and double standard.
I still need to see an argument that holds any ground when it comes to that.
No reason why TO shouldn’t be added.
When you find me something as unfair as planes vs non-AA ground vehicles we can talk.
2 Likes
Say it again, without mentioning Air RB.
That usage of that ‘‘reason’’ is offensive likely to a lot of people, and the fact you even used it on the forums here shows not just bad taste, but it shows you’re keen on derailing it to avoid that overshadowing reason that you can’t make it clear why you should get that mode in the first place.
It’s not unfair, that’s just your opinion.
Absolute hogwash. You aren’t dead in the water, and when the enemy is strafing often they can’t even see the target, so they have no visual on you, moving slowly forward or back to make proper hits.
Why shouldn’t I mention ARB ?
Me giving you a really simple example, as I thought you need one, isn’t derailing.
I made it really clear but you not accepting that answer is your own issue.
One side not being able to strike back in any way imaginable in a PvP game is indeed unfair.
Here players should be able to verse each other, but in plenty of situations they can’t due to really bad mechanics.
Me getting strafed is still an interference, I really hope you understand that.
Your statement also ignores a large part of the game where CAS has access to precision, guided munitions that can hit you from several kilometers away, so reacting to it is impossible.
3 Likes
Because then his reasoning doesn’t work.
Like with Maus being able to be on 1.0 because someone from a team could spawn a plane and destroy It ;)
4 Likes
I thought that was the case.
ARB is a safe heaven for pilots to play planes interference free. TO would be the same but for tanks.
But I guess tanks aren’t allowed to play “dumbed down” version of the game but somehow planes are. Interesting double standard.
3 Likes
Because you keep bringing it up to avoid a genuine reason as to why it should be added.
No.
Imagine not being able to use a vehicle to save yourself or your team…
The broad stance of the need for this mode has no care for the BR, until it’s pressed…
This absurd round and round should just get you removed… It’s not genuine and it’s just constantly this for the past week… How daft.
You can think that but you are indeed wrong… You’re just making sure you can hide away from the point, much the same as this absurd need to mention the maus at 1.0.
Guys, stop going round in circles.
Why should your supporters even get thier own mode if they are any of the ones in game abusing pilots JUST because they got got, so much so that all day was kids breaking to all and swearing and abusing people because they got got.
It’s a real sign of imaturity to not understand the concept of an opponent vs an enemy…
To not understand that some people would just like to play tanks and having another mode is not a problem.
To not understand that some people would like to have a fair chance while being in a tank against an enemy (as they have thanks to B.R. And map changes)
To not understand that when people are talking about what they can do while being in a tank, suggesting just not using it is not valid argument.
To not understand that you can’t use one reasoning to justify one thing and then later say that it doesn’t apply somewhere else because „reasons”
I could go on and on. The only one going in circles is a person saying that someone should not be playing a tank while he just wants to do that.
5 Likes
That is a genuine reason but you’re seemingly unable to accept it. I already gave you a perfectly clear example of how one group having something directly makes another group to be eligible for the same thing.
I’m in a vehicle that can’t strike back.
But it makes your statement totally wrong and unusable for very big part of the game.
I’m not because mentioning ARB is pretty much the point here. You’re the one that wants this ARB argument to go away, to no surprise really as you know very well AlanHR made a slam dunk on your “dumbing down the game” argument.
5 Likes
According to this logic every pvp game should be like a cs, where everyone is absolutely equal in any time and games like squad shouldn’t exist.
This is a pretty standard situation where you can’t counter everything at the same time for games in which several branches of military presented and you usually need to change classes or rely on team.
2 Likes
Yes bro, I think counter strike will become more popular and successful if they added more game modes like drone strike mode where players with two kills can use drone to bomb that awp camper by spending extra points, better yet a ghost mode where players who were killed can play as an invisible ghost to kill players who are still alive, only ghost can kill another ghost. Easily turning a billion dollar game into trillion dollar. Like you only got two restaurants serving non-halal foods, but decided to open another one serving halal foods, your businesses now cater to more customers, diversification bro
3 Likes
I have indeed. Why do you need to be so demeaning.
It’s not even anything thag special. It was not some kind of stand out teamwork. The only thing that happened in chat was some wird talk about being a dinosaur.
Your team did well despite you being in an SPAA. And somehow this is a doozy and some great teamwork?
There is no issue with that. I just summarised the match for ULQ.
I did not focus on the kills because it was not some 10 kill game in the ostwind or something similar. If you got like 5 plane kills I would have said that was inpressive. I know since I have had up to 7 plane kill games with the TPK. I just pointed out it was a pretty standard match and you getting insulted over it is kind of childish.
What part of my reply was bad faith? You are just grasping for straws.
Squad is a bad comparison here since specialist kits still have the same effectiveness at taking out the main threat that is infantry. And if you have to take down a tank or a heli there is always someone playing AT because it is just a rifleman kit with an AT weapon.
Bro still thinks that, after having three different people each explain it multiple times, that we want to take away combined arms from him, despite half of us saying we’d probably play combined arms anyway even if they added TO
5 Likes
He think losing players to TO mode and he would losing his CAS in CA mode.
Which means the only reason people play CA is due to a hostage situation (only multiplayer tank game with high variety of (mostly) realistically modelled vehicles and actual gameplay without requiring you to sit in voice chat just to operate a single tank effectively ala Red orchestra or Il2:GB) rather than genuine desire presently.
2 Likes
ARB and TO are polar opposites.
One is completely essential to playing almost all air vehicles, and the other is objectively harmful, and appeals to a small portion of players.
According to whom?
Objectively? Can you prove that statement with data?
Didn’t we already have a discussion on this where we came to the conclusion that it isn’t objective?
6 Likes
Lol, lmao even.
Strange metric you don’t hold to TO supporters. TO would give Gaijin an excuse to stop balancing CAS. We know Gajin would based on how they treated free parts, bombers, the F-104s, simulator, and any other feature that Gajin ruined just to make the community shut up about it.
It’s not an opinion, it’s simply looking at what Gajin did in the past, and realizing they’re gonna continue doing it.
Subjectively, some people will enjoy playing TO.
Objectively, less money for Gajin and less incentive to balance CAS