Your whole idea of how to solve this issue is directly the opposite of what Gaijin wants to do, it’s pretty obvious from all these years. This is what I’m trying to tell you.
We’d need dozens of fairly uninteresting (as a vehicle type) AA vehicles being researched, developed and balanced to just fulfill one part of your idea. This translates into months of labor for Gaijin, and I don’t see how it would be equally profitable as spending that time doing just that but for higher/top tier tanks/jets.
Sure, they might throw in a few copy/paste AAs into the mix to trick people they’re actually trying to fix this long lasting issue as fast as possible.
Second part of your idea is the changing of our game mode which as well takes time and resources, while benefits (profit in their case) don’t seem to be great. No wonder we’re keeping the same modes for years, how surprising is that ?
Your idea is fine on paper, but we need those changes now and not in half a decade, as frankly we’ve waited enough. By far the easiest and honestly, the best, course of action would be to add a TO mode as that would immediately take those imbalances out of the equation.
Well, lucky your opinion is worth as much as mine, and where have you even seen what Gaijin WANT to do… You’re only dismissing and deriding my opinion because of the fact that you don’t want my opin ion because it doesn’t align with your demands…
Seriously, peak discussion here folks… /s
Stop trying to gatekeep and make out it’s not allowed for me to hold an opinion, ‘right or wrong’ IN YOUR EYES…
Also, you’ve missed a lot of my suggestions and opinions because you likely didn’t even read them, because you are that hooked up on fixating on the ‘Add SPAA’ one of recent, which has been a common one all along…
You’ve missed the addition of other targets and objectives, spreading out of the map and making it so that planes fly longer to get there. AI AAA is another which wouldn’t be bad, and the fact that you’re that hooked on shouting it down and making me out to be absurd, it’s clear there is no discussion here because you can’t take on board anything of what’s put forth because you would have to admit there are better ways than just putting in this tank only mode that you crave… It’s the same as the SBMM…
You only want those, so you can only stand those who echo your desire.
AI AAA and bigger maps only makes the problem appear less not fix it for people wanting just to play tanks. We already talked about it.
Do we want to solve the issue or sweep it under the rug?
TO solves the issue by default as people who just want to play tanks could play it and in combined mode only people who like combined aspect of the game would remain. It would solve some issues with balance of the teams.
SBMM solves the issue of different players skill, meaning that it would be less likely that team would meet a pro who can destroy them without them being able to do much about It.
AI AAA would be either too good or to bad, meaning that it would either make people liking the air aspect of the game angry (as they would no longer be able to do what they see as fun/look at the helipad AA case) or too bad meaning people could just ignore It.
Bigger maps only make flight to the battlefield longer so people instead of dying in „x” time to planes would die in „1.2x” time. People who like air aspect of the game already don’t like it how long they need to fly in prop planes above 6.7 - so aleady an issue that doesn’t solve anything for people wanting to just plan tanks.
New objectives for air would only matter for people who don’t want to attack players and You have to remember that there would be limited number of them. Again the same case as with bigger maps/longer flight time.
You can always explain how what I have said would not be the case. I would love to discuss it.
I’ll maintain my position, that your ‘discussion’ is nothing less than dictation, and the dogpiling and mockery that has gone on for so long, which has almost become an accepted norm, has destroyed any aspect of discussion that there was to have on this topic.
This is actually what I said so far back that it’s not funny… The Anti-CAS contingient, will be abusive at the drop of a hat, labelling anyone who dares to object a CAS-main, with every insinuation that they have no skill, or are just so abusive of the playerbase that they’re the worst person ever alive.
And that’s where this dogpiling starts to become a problem, when it genuinely overflows.
So we need to end it here as You don’t want to discuss points made and just play a victim and destroy the topic.
I tried to have a discussion explaining different approaches to the issue and how they would impact the gameplay and the „problem” we are discussing in this topic.
You’re the one saying that, but as you can see, you’ve only come in to say that my suggestions would be shit, on the back of what I have said regarding that very mentality you espose in all of these threads about the nagative, dismissing anything that could be an option, just for your suggestions alone…
Discussion goes both ways, but for you, it doesn’t… It’s just the mode, and the matchmaker you want, because you know how everything else wouldn’t be done, because you villify the other players, and opponents…
You added this after I formed the above, it further cements that you are the issue with this forum and genuine actual engagement when you are facing me…
And your dogpiles are actually so abusive and ignorant that you just want an echo chamber.
After all, that’s why you make out that I am the one that destroys the topic… You’re projecting.
I haven’t called them that, just said how it would impact the gameplay and the „problem” that is being discussed in this topic.
If You know that what I have said is not true You can always explain it so we can discuss it instead of getting angry that someone dares to not agree with You.
No, you’ve just come in here to say that it all won’t work… Yea, great contribution to the discussion… You PROVE what I said about the fact of this end of the thread…
But how do YOU know that these things I suggest won’t work? That’s the thing IT’S A TWO WAY STREET HERE…
You’re lying here, as you posted your one line, then put the second portion to make out you were tollerant and accepting.
No, I said my piece, and this constant making out like you’re discussing anything is just for show…
The fact that I say anything and you immediately have to come in like you’re a dictator is the issue… There is no discussion with you, and the inevitible ‘You can PM me’ line is an abuse tactic.
Stop trolling, because it’s clear you’re only in this end of the thread to provoke.
If you can’t take on board my stances, as per usual, then there is no discussion with you, and you merely want to make out that I am the unreasonable person here.
This game is over a decade old and some patterns can be observed. We keep using the same old modes and by looking at the changes to modes over the years, it’s obvious they aren’t being worked on regularly.
This tells me it’s highly unlikely for Gaijin to massively change and rework a mode.
I’m not doing that, I’m just telling you that Gaijin doesn’t really have a track record of doing things you suggested.
Just look at how many premium aircraft they’ve added over the years in comparison to premium AAs. They definitely know where the money is, so focusing that makes sense from a business standpoint.
As I said, your idea is good on paper, but Gaijin stopping everything just to add dozens of competitive AAs to fill the gaps isn’t likely to happen. They might add those in the next several years but that’s way too slow, and I’m pretty sure by that time more gaping holes would be created, so it becomes an endless circle.
That argument looks good until you realize it’d take Gaijin years to fulfill that, which is a long time considering we’ve already spent years in this unbalanced state.
You need to realize those are big changes that’d require a lot of work to implement and balance. We already know how much Gaijin likes to spend their time on altering their modes.
I don’t really want to wait years and years for those ways to be added and suffer until then. You’re acting like all of that is already mostly done and we’re few weeks away from all that being implemented. Sad truth is that we’re years away from that.
TO would solve those issues much faster and easier while more or less being plug-and-play.
the temporary solution is simple for high tier cas, just remove any fnf a2g that outrange top tier spaa until we have fnf spaa with equivalent range, so any fnf a2g currently should have 7km max range
To be honest, I get tired of the dogpiling and the mockery, for the sake of statchecking and continuing the argument against the person rather than the actual discussion of the points raised…
That’s how this always ends up because of that select few…
Just look at Motorola now putting up a page of why my suggestions won’t get put in, yet they’re putting forth something that’s been put forth for 6 years now, without change…
Telling me, suggestions that we’ve made as counters to this want for a special mode, and the continuing back and forth telling everyone that ONLY this special mode and labeling are acceptable, that MY suggestions, WON’T be brought in because ‘gaijin’…
It’s just projecting and literal gatekeeping…
Solve it…
I’m tired of commenting in threads and having these select few dogpiling and making out that it’s my fault for even commenting… It’s just deminishing to discussion, no matter how much ULQ and these guys even say they’re discussing anything, as they aren’t, they are trying for an echo chamber and constantly berating anyone who dares to mention any other option.
I don’t want PMs, I don’t want any sort of ‘It’s both sides’ nonsense… I’m not wrong for making the comments, I’m not wrong for holding the opinion. My stats have nothing to do with this, and my advice isn’t limited to merely being low teir… The gatekeeping and echo chambers need to be stopped.
This is an example of the silliness that comes from this sort of thing… I don’t align with what’s demanded, so I MUST be defending Gaijin…
Just beyond a damn joke… I answered this many times in this thread, yet they proclaim that they haven’t been answered…
My suggestion takes little to no effort to put in the game, meanwhile yours would take months of constant work just on that in order to implement it.
I’m telling you that your suggestions won’t be brought in a sensible time frame which is a massive problem. You’re mixing things up.
Who said you’re wrong for doing that ?
My opinion is that your opinion is wrong, which makes you upset for some reason. We don’t need to agree on things.
Considering you have 26 games in GRB using rank 7 and 8 vehicles I think your opinion on that isn’t very valid.
That’s like I start having opinions on Naval after I played half a dozen games in that game mode.