CAS problem

That’s why we need a new game mode bro, so these topic will stopped coming up, it’s one of the most requested game mode by many bro

Seriously, I will even spend money for this mode if gaijing make it a premium feature to opt out of having to deal with CAS

2 Likes

What is absurd about having combined arms?

2 Likes

What is absurd about making out you need to remove an already established mode because you can’t get movement on what you want?

Everything?

The fact of you being so absurd to suggest we need to remove them makes it clear you really are struggling.

This is perfect example of your double standards.

Tank only - NO, this game is COMBINED ARMS!

Ok? Then add playable tanks to ARB or remove ARB, as it is not combined arms right now

NOO! It’s “established mode”!

3 Likes

Buddy its a combined arms game i’m advocating for planes to be in combined arms? I don’t know what struggle you are referring to

1 Like

Based on the record he is not struggling with the game, but you are lol

Imagine needing to spend more sp than anyone else, still only manage to only get 40ish percent and mostly negative kd. Bro should have spent more time learning the game instead of wasting forum space

5 Likes

Hey man grb has only been established for like a whole year less :(

Around 12 years?

God I’m old

It’s a combined aspect game when you use it as an argument against something you don’t like.

When you point out a certain mode in the game that isn’t combined you are met with an not all modes need to be combined argument. Or something as silly as that.

6 Likes

People should be allowed to play as tanks in Air and engage both the AI and other players playing as tanks. Same with player controlled boats/battleships if the map allows it. This would pretty much solve all issues people have with CAS since the game would be a true combined arms game.

2 Likes

well you see, this would reduce his ability to get free kills, and therefore its bad. have you considered his right to free kills?

5 Likes

And while we’re at it Air maps should be reduced to the size where AAs can control most of the air space.

“But it costs 600 SP!!! I deserve it as killstreak reward.”

3 Likes

It is not “camping a single spot the whole game” it is holding a spot in order to take resources away from the objective. To camp in that spot the whole game would be tactically unsound, but one would hold it for as long as that position is tenable and achieves the goal desired.

If that person is able to hold that spot with just a vehicle, no plane, then good players would be able to dislodge that player with tanks, no?

1 Like

Look at this 💩, me doing nothing significant two assists one death then I can afford a Pe-8 with 5 ton bomb lol

4 Likes

You did that much?!

You deserve it king. I hope You got that pesky camping tankers.

I needed to cap a zone and have an assist in order to spawn PE-8


This guys should have known that at their 2nd spawn, the PE-8 is going to kill them and hide!

In this one, I capped a zone and killed someone!

5 Likes

Eyyy, I’ve earned it alright. Two kill assists, goddammit, bro. I clearly did more than enough to earn a 5-ton bomb! also did you see how many bombers in my team? tanker should have know it is a race to jump into a CAS! wanna play tank? nah you play spaa

3 Likes

That feeling when you see more planes in GRB than in off-peak ASB matches.

Suggestions about player-operated GFs in the Air modes has been heard before and laughed at due to the realities of the situation–not any “double standards.”

The basic problem with the concept is that its ignorant of the realities involved. If those suggesting this idea understood its ramifications, they wouldn’t be suggesting it:

Here are the realities that inhibit the idea:

  • Air mode maps are often as big as 64km by 64km and sometimes larger
    • These maps commonly have various impassable obstacles for ground vehicles beyond their sheer size, such as bodies of water, mountains and just comically unsuitable road conditions.
      • On the Britain map, one road that has a sheer vertical incline, akin to this picture:
Spoiler

Given that many GFs players are unwilling to drive about on 4km by 4km maps, the belief that they’d be keen (nevermind happy) to run about on 64km by 64km maps is patently absurd–nevermind with all the obstacles involved too.

I do not want to be mean…but the whole concept of players in GFs vehicles running around on the AF mode maps is just not a viable concept. The screeching complaints about driving for 20 minutes to maybe see an enemy to target is just not something anyone wants to see.


To correct you: the Air modes are already combined arms modes, via AI units because players could not be practically there due to the map size limitations. This fact means there is no double standard nor absence of CA in the Air modes…it’s all there.

As far as suggestion about removing the Air modes goes…it’s utterly ridiculous, especially given that the air modes’ success is what enabled everything else that followed. The AF modes are sovereign and what happens in those mode is really up to Gaijin and that mode’s own playerbase, not outsiders.

Far from being contemptuous about the air modes, tankers (and NF players) should be thankful and gratuitous about what let them come to be. Without the air modes’ success, WT would not be as it is.

“Air modes are already combined arms modes, via AI units because players could not be practically there due to the map size limitations. This fact means there is no double standard nor absence of CA in the Air modes…it’s all there.”

“via AI units”

So in theory we could fix CAS in ground by having it also be AI. This would solve players revenge bombing and prevent rounds from just being air in a ground map.