And then to what I have replied to as first comment and later on what I have already cited:
I haven’t replied to the comment talking about actual range, I have replied to that. I have later on made statements on effective range which I was discussing, not actual ranges as they are not important. Even a tank well placed is able to hit targets and really high altitude.
Again, I talk about effective range and always were because:
It’s about the range, and your ignorance of it not being the effective range you claim, but actual deterrence range…
This is something you don’t want to accept or understand because it conflicts with your want to paint things out as stat-bound, and predicted outcomes.
From the beginning I was talking about effective range, I have already cited all the comments and what I have replied to and what You have replied to. Sorry but I won’t bother in destroying this topic more.
Then you’ve missed the point of the statement. Read more, stop trying to argue points that weren’t even made just because you see me, making a statement…
My stats don’t matter, I don’t argue out of spite as you put it, and you’re always trying to make an argument out of it to force me into subbmission or to shout me down…
There’s nothing conversational, or worth discussing with you, because of that side of everything…
The topic at hand is already quite fiery… let’s avoid making it even worse.
It’s totally fine to argue and to disagree with someone as long as your behavior is within the guidelines. However, please try to avoid being passive aggressive just for the sake of provoking. It’ll just lead to more problems. Discussions can be held and disagreements can be settled.
Lastly, if something starts diving too deep into a personal dispute, then feel free to take it to PMs or to block someone that makes you feel uncomfortable. The option is there for a reason.
(avoid unnecessary comments such as: “Y’all should also block this guy…”)
Yea, I frankly don’t think the suggestion to take it to PMs is wise because of the harrassing nature of ULQ to keep pushing buttons and making ascertions about skill and lack there-of at every turn just to goad and ignore the points raised.
Hence why…
Now please back to the topic.
So, is there a way to quickly confirm if a ground main is trying to balance things or just want all CAS to die already? Will complaints on ImpChapp, 09, M247, Strela, etc or anything just do the job?
Asking the real questions here… Was any effort even attempted, or did they just roll over and fire MGs to become a beacon.
I think instead of getting rid of CAS make it a bit like how Ground Arcade does it. (Full maximum planes up is 8, 4 for each team).
Create poll for removing dedicated air modes
This sort of absurdium, makes it incredibly hard to take those who want changes to be made seriously.
That’s why we need a new game mode bro, so these topic will stopped coming up, it’s one of the most requested game mode by many bro
Seriously, I will even spend money for this mode if gaijing make it a premium feature to opt out of having to deal with CAS
What is absurd about having combined arms?
What is absurd about making out you need to remove an already established mode because you can’t get movement on what you want?
Everything?
The fact of you being so absurd to suggest we need to remove them makes it clear you really are struggling.
This is perfect example of your double standards.
Tank only - NO, this game is COMBINED ARMS!
Ok? Then add playable tanks to ARB or remove ARB, as it is not combined arms right now
NOO! It’s “established mode”!
Buddy its a combined arms game i’m advocating for planes to be in combined arms? I don’t know what struggle you are referring to
Based on the record he is not struggling with the game, but you are lol
Imagine needing to spend more sp than anyone else, still only manage to only get 40ish percent and mostly negative kd. Bro should have spent more time learning the game instead of wasting forum space
Hey man grb has only been established for like a whole year less :(
Around 12 years?
God I’m old