Could be nice. Maybe have them fix it before adding it to ground. For planes, you have to pay the sp cost of a second spawn if you want to change anything.
Pretty dumb that they want me to spend like 1200sp to change my fuel load
So capping a zone and doing a few hits, such a large amount.
If You are saying that SPAA is an answear to the problem, prove it to be. Because at this moment Your stats show against what You are saying.
Still better than having a ‘death’ ;)
If you want to follow your companions there will be times when you don’t have much coverage.
And the SPAA that do not have radar? I think there are more SPAA without radar than with radar, and they do need an AA sight.
Exactly, if you shoot with the Centurion AVRE at an enemy at 1600 and you don’t hit them, it’s because you lack skill.
When a plane makes a fast pass and you are not even under it, it is extremely difficult to shoot it down, which would depend more on being lucky that a bullet hits it, not on skill.
Of course it is the worst moment, it is the moment in which many players seek to take out CAS just to abuse, taking advantage of the fact that there is no defense on the map.
Wow. I’m not really one of those who usually look at player stats, but in the end I’m going to have to go look at them, so I can save myself a lot of the conversations that waste my time.
1 Like
You always know the answear when they get defensive about it ;)
I don’t get how my stats have anything to do with this. I simply said that if we had more SPAAs spawn at the right time with players knowing how to use while other teammates play as a team then it would fix this issue.
2 Likes
IR spaa are great. I can spawn those and shut down the air space.
Has been a bit since i have used cannon spaa but i can try those again if need be
If You say that SPAA are enough to solve the issue then prove it.
1 Like
You say abuse but they are just playing the aircraft the way they should. Also this goes back to when I said that people should learn from the battles before on when you see the most CAS and take out a SPAA before they spawn to stop them.
That would be a buff that SPAA never had and would make it unrealistic, that feature exist in arcade battles because ground realistic is meant to be realistic like it says in the name.
Most of the time (from what I have seen) when a plane does a low pass its to get across the battlefield, you have to kind of go higher to hit a target properly
2 Likes
Wow such a good argument, repeating what you said doesn’t make it better. Plus you must not have read what I said.
2 Likes
But here nobody plays as a team. Those who take the CAS after three minutes do not do it for the team, they do it out of selfishness, simply to get some easy kills, that is also why many people do not take SPAA, because they only want to kill tanks ,but in any case the SPAA cannot protect the tanks of the planes, almost always what you will do is revenge because the plane will have already dropped the bombs, and in some cases the pilot will not be mediocre and will also kill the SPAA. That is why a balancing of the planes is necessary, it cannot be that the goal of Ground Realistic Battles is to use the plane most of the time in battle. That is why the ARBs exist. But of course, here there are not 16 planes that attack you at the same time. moment, or that you have to be aware of whether someone will attack you while you attack the ground targets, or you throw a 1000kg bomb at an AI tank and due to bugs on the ground you don’t kill it.
I dont see how adding historical AA sights that allow for a calculated/estimated lead would be unrralistic when plenty of AA vehicles had this, to the point there could be a dedicated guy doing this job.
Edit:
Images of predictor computer:
Air mode has ground and naval elements to it. So yeah kinda. There just arent any player controlled ground elements.
I think you have not understood me, the AA sights are not what the SPAAs have with radar, I am referring to the sight that has circles, not the typical + tank sight.
And trying to deny it won’t change it.
If You are making a statment about SPAA, You should be able to prove it.
If You can’t prove it, then Your statment is false.
The statment I’m reffering to^
Most of you are not even reading what I say. Let me show you again.
I’m I wrong about if these thing happened it would solve a lot of these issues?
And if not then why?
Ok I thought you meant the sights that arcade battles. I’m all for it if its historically accurate.
I didn’t deny anything? I just started using SPAA only and I was getting kills and pretty much took out most of the CAS spawning. I don’t get why that even takes away from what I said about more people should use SPAA.
1 Like
Do You think that SPAA is Effective against the air? If Yes, then prove it, if not, then why tell people to use it?
It certainly is to some extent.
2 Likes
So one battle is enough evidence?
1 Like
I agree with the need for cash to be better. It’s over the top and needs to be limited or reduced in its ability to decimate every one and everything in majority of games. I like the ideas raised to nerf the issue and this is a good method!👍🏽